This study investigates the performance of two Italian nonfluent aphasic patients on noun– adjective agreement in compounds and in noun phrases. A completion, a reading, and a repeti- tion task were administered. Results show that both patients were able to correctly inflect adjectives within compounds, but not in noun phrases. Moreover, they were sensitive to con- stituent order (noun–adjective vs adjective–noun) within noun phrases, but less so within compounds. These results suggest differential processing for compounds as compared to noun phrases: While the latter require standard morphosyntactic operations that are often impaired in aphasic patients, the former can be accessed as whole words at the lexical level.

Why Is “Red Cross” Different from “Yellow Cross”?: A Neuropsychological Study of Noun–Adjective Agreement within Italian Compounds

MONDINI, SARA
;
SEMENZA, CARLO
Membro del Collaboration Group
2002

Abstract

This study investigates the performance of two Italian nonfluent aphasic patients on noun– adjective agreement in compounds and in noun phrases. A completion, a reading, and a repeti- tion task were administered. Results show that both patients were able to correctly inflect adjectives within compounds, but not in noun phrases. Moreover, they were sensitive to con- stituent order (noun–adjective vs adjective–noun) within noun phrases, but less so within compounds. These results suggest differential processing for compounds as compared to noun phrases: While the latter require standard morphosyntactic operations that are often impaired in aphasic patients, the former can be accessed as whole words at the lexical level.
2002
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/1353779
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact