This paper reviews the main theoretical and practical arguments in favor and against governments’ policies supporting Free/Open Source (F/OS) software. Using the information gathered from the OSOR.eu website, we build an original dataset about F/OS software interventions across Europe and we show that public adoption and advisory are the most common type of interventions in Europe. Our analysis suggests that, to evaluate in a meaningful way rationales, motivations and consequences of public interventions, one has to properly distinguish between the various roles played by policy makers and the different categories of software involved. We provide empirical evidence that F/OS support is stronger in countries i) where egovernment services are more largely available, and ii) where the domestic software industry is lagging behind. This evidence supports common views among F/OS advocates.
Public Intervention for Free/Open Source Software
MANENTI, FABIO;
2011
Abstract
This paper reviews the main theoretical and practical arguments in favor and against governments’ policies supporting Free/Open Source (F/OS) software. Using the information gathered from the OSOR.eu website, we build an original dataset about F/OS software interventions across Europe and we show that public adoption and advisory are the most common type of interventions in Europe. Our analysis suggests that, to evaluate in a meaningful way rationales, motivations and consequences of public interventions, one has to properly distinguish between the various roles played by policy makers and the different categories of software involved. We provide empirical evidence that F/OS support is stronger in countries i) where egovernment services are more largely available, and ii) where the domestic software industry is lagging behind. This evidence supports common views among F/OS advocates.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
