Pathogenic strains of Bacillus anthracis produce two potent toxins, lethal toxin (LT), a metalloprotease that cleaves mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases, and oedema toxin (ET), a calcium/calmodulin-dependent adenylate cyclase. Emerging evidence indicates a role for both toxins in suppressing the initiation of both innate and adaptive immune responses, which are essential to keep the infection under control. Here we show that LT and ET inhibit chemotaxis of T-cells and macrophages by subverting signalling by both CXC and CC chemokine receptors. The data highlight a novel strategy of immunosuppression by B. anthracis based on inhibition of immune cell homing.

Anthrax toxins inhibit immune cell chemotaxis by perturbing chemokine receptor signalling

MONTECUCCO, CESARE;
2007

Abstract

Pathogenic strains of Bacillus anthracis produce two potent toxins, lethal toxin (LT), a metalloprotease that cleaves mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases, and oedema toxin (ET), a calcium/calmodulin-dependent adenylate cyclase. Emerging evidence indicates a role for both toxins in suppressing the initiation of both innate and adaptive immune responses, which are essential to keep the infection under control. Here we show that LT and ET inhibit chemotaxis of T-cells and macrophages by subverting signalling by both CXC and CC chemokine receptors. The data highlight a novel strategy of immunosuppression by B. anthracis based on inhibition of immune cell homing.
2007
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CellMicrobiol2007.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (publisher's version)
Licenza: Accesso libero
Dimensione 269.15 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
269.15 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/1774690
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 45
  • Scopus 59
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 56
social impact