Network simulators are a fundamental tool for the performance evaluation of protocols and applications in complex scenarios, which would be too expensive or infeasible to realize in practice. With the aim to provide a shared environment for the simulation of underwater networks we have adapted the ns2 network simulator to provide a detailed reproduction of the propagation of sound in water (i.e., by means of ray tracing instead of empirical relations). This has been tied to formerly available simulation frameworks (such as the MIRACLE extensions to ns2) to provide a completely customizable tool, including acoustic propagation, physical layer modeling, and cross-layer specification of networking protocols. In this paper, we describe our tool, and use it for a case study involving the comparison of three MAC protocols for underwater networks over different kinds of physical layers. Our results compare the transmission coordination approach chosen by each protocol, and show when it is better to rely on random access, as opposed to loose or tight coordination.

World ocean simulation system (WOSS): a simulation tool for underwater networks with realistic propagation modeling

CASARI, PAOLO;ZORZI, MICHELE
2009

Abstract

Network simulators are a fundamental tool for the performance evaluation of protocols and applications in complex scenarios, which would be too expensive or infeasible to realize in practice. With the aim to provide a shared environment for the simulation of underwater networks we have adapted the ns2 network simulator to provide a detailed reproduction of the propagation of sound in water (i.e., by means of ray tracing instead of empirical relations). This has been tied to formerly available simulation frameworks (such as the MIRACLE extensions to ns2) to provide a completely customizable tool, including acoustic propagation, physical layer modeling, and cross-layer specification of networking protocols. In this paper, we describe our tool, and use it for a case study involving the comparison of three MAC protocols for underwater networks over different kinds of physical layers. Our results compare the transmission coordination approach chosen by each protocol, and show when it is better to rely on random access, as opposed to loose or tight coordination.
2009
Proc. of ACM WUWNet 2009
9781605588216
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2374328
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 124
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact