PURPOSE: Haken Baby Syndrome (SBS) presents with acute encephalopathy, subdural and retinal haemorrhages, with inconsistent history, in < 2 years old. Long-term sequelae are still under study. Aim is to present the long-term outcome in a case series of SBS followed-up by a multidisciplinary team. METHODS: Case series of 14 children (9M,%F) with confirmed SBS has been examined and followed-up. Patients underwent funds evaluation (indirect ophtalmoscopy) and wide-field digital ophthalmic camera (RetCam II) until bleeding reabsorption. Assessment was repeated at follow-up combined with ocular motility evaluation, visual field (BEFIE test), visual acuity (Teller acuity cards), refractometry, cognitive-behavioural evaluations (Griffiths scales, Child Behaviour Check List), and family stress measurement (Parenting Stress Index), segmentation analysis of MRI. RESULTS: Mean age at acute episode of SBS: 6.5 months (range 2-20), 9/14 in the first 6 months of life. Mean age at last follow-up evaluation: 32 months (range 8-65). 4 cases were lost to follow-up. At last follow-up evaluation: 4 out of 10 had a decreased visual acuity (cortical visual impairment), 4 out of 10 had visual field deficits, 3 out of 10 had strabismus. None of the cases showed significant refractive errors. Cognitive/behavioural assessment demonstrated global delay and impairments in neuromotor ability, speech/language development and attention problems. MRI analysis showed atrophic alterations in several brain areas. CONCLUSION:Multidisciplinary assessment including ophthalmologic examination and neurobehavioral evaluation provides crucial prognostic information in cases of suspected SBS. Functional outcome is largely dependent on brain injury and atrophy.

Long-term outcome and morphology/function correlates in cases of shaken baby syndrome

PINELLO, LUISA;ROSA RIZZOTTO, MELISSA;FACCHIN, PAOLA
2010

Abstract

PURPOSE: Haken Baby Syndrome (SBS) presents with acute encephalopathy, subdural and retinal haemorrhages, with inconsistent history, in < 2 years old. Long-term sequelae are still under study. Aim is to present the long-term outcome in a case series of SBS followed-up by a multidisciplinary team. METHODS: Case series of 14 children (9M,%F) with confirmed SBS has been examined and followed-up. Patients underwent funds evaluation (indirect ophtalmoscopy) and wide-field digital ophthalmic camera (RetCam II) until bleeding reabsorption. Assessment was repeated at follow-up combined with ocular motility evaluation, visual field (BEFIE test), visual acuity (Teller acuity cards), refractometry, cognitive-behavioural evaluations (Griffiths scales, Child Behaviour Check List), and family stress measurement (Parenting Stress Index), segmentation analysis of MRI. RESULTS: Mean age at acute episode of SBS: 6.5 months (range 2-20), 9/14 in the first 6 months of life. Mean age at last follow-up evaluation: 32 months (range 8-65). 4 cases were lost to follow-up. At last follow-up evaluation: 4 out of 10 had a decreased visual acuity (cortical visual impairment), 4 out of 10 had visual field deficits, 3 out of 10 had strabismus. None of the cases showed significant refractive errors. Cognitive/behavioural assessment demonstrated global delay and impairments in neuromotor ability, speech/language development and attention problems. MRI analysis showed atrophic alterations in several brain areas. CONCLUSION:Multidisciplinary assessment including ophthalmologic examination and neurobehavioral evaluation provides crucial prognostic information in cases of suspected SBS. Functional outcome is largely dependent on brain injury and atrophy.
2010
EVER 2010. Abstract book.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2419386
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact