This paper presents Performance Evaluation Criteria (PEC) dubbed Penalty Factor (PF) and Total Temperature Penalization (TTP) for condensation inside tubes. This general methodology allows for the ranking of refrigerants for condenser applications based on their heat transfer potentials. Among halocarbons, higher pressure fluids have lower PF and TTP values than medium and lower pressure refrigerants, with ammonia outperforming all refrigerants. These PEC are also used to develop simple theoretical models for the optimization of condenser refrigerant circuitry. As examples, two condenser optimization cases are considered, with the theoretical predictions comparing favorably with simulation results from a detailed heat exchanger model.

In-tube condensation performance of refrigerants considering penalization terms (exergy losses) for heat transfer and pressure drop

CAVALLINI, ALBERTO;DEL COL, DAVIDE;ZILIO, CLAUDIO
2010

Abstract

This paper presents Performance Evaluation Criteria (PEC) dubbed Penalty Factor (PF) and Total Temperature Penalization (TTP) for condensation inside tubes. This general methodology allows for the ranking of refrigerants for condenser applications based on their heat transfer potentials. Among halocarbons, higher pressure fluids have lower PF and TTP values than medium and lower pressure refrigerants, with ammonia outperforming all refrigerants. These PEC are also used to develop simple theoretical models for the optimization of condenser refrigerant circuitry. As examples, two condenser optimization cases are considered, with the theoretical predictions comparing favorably with simulation results from a detailed heat exchanger model.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2453515
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 56
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 50
social impact