Reply to Comment on “Shear wave profiles from surface wave inversion: the impact of uncertainty onto seismic site response analysis”

Socco et al (2012 J. Geophys. Eng. 9 241) comment on our study about the effect of non-uniqueness of surface wave solutions on seismic site response analysis. In particular, they refer to the approach we adopted for the selection of equivalent shear wave velocity profiles and argue that it leads to overestimation of the uncertainty due to the inherent ill-posedness of the problem. Moreover, for one of the synthetic cases of our original paper, they calculate a different set of equivalent velocity profiles, retrieving the corresponding amplification spectra. From these results, Socco et al claim that their general conclusion that the impact of solution non-uniqueness on seismic response simulations is negligible. In this reply we demonstrate that (a) the uncertainty bounds used by Socco et al in their prediction analysis, as a consequence of their surface wave inversion procedure, are unreasonably narrow; (b) consequently, their shaking predictions appear to suffer no impact from their underestimated uncertainty; and (c) their presented case shows an amplification spectrum that is only the result of assuming the existence of a bedrock at 150 m that causes resonance of the overlying layer—practically independent of the details of the S-wave velocity distribution.