Background and Aims: The epidemiology of hepatitis B in Europe is changing, with migration causing significant increases in prevalence rates. It is of paramount importance to identify the most effective ways to contain the disease. Systematic screening and treatment of migrants for CHB virus infection is likely to be cost-effective, but it is crucial to take into account the significant associated costs and the considerable net investment by governments. The objective of this study is to estimate the health and economic effects of screening for CHB screening among immigrants. Methods: We used the Markov model to examine the costconsequence of screening and treatment vs a no screening strategy in a cohort of 348,991 adult migrants resident in the Veneto Region. The rate of adherence to the HBV screening program was judged to be 40%. The prevalence of HBV infection and the chance of having active CHB was based on our recent screening campaign in Padua involving 465 migrants (table). Likelihood of HBV-related events were obtained from literature. Population 465,322 Age group >20 y 348,991 HBsAg+, n (%) 21,048 (6) Active CHB, n (%) 6,314 (30) Rate of adherence to screening program, n (%) 2,525 (40) Results: The screening-treatment strategy prevented 273 cases of cirrhosis, 18 decompensated cirrhosis, 28 HCC, and 54 CHB related deaths, over a period of 5 years. The incremental cost of the screening strategy totaled 51,597,980 € in five years (0.1% of the Veneto annual health budget). Conclusions: This study provides information useful mainly to policy makers, who need to establish whether the cost generated by a screening strategy are affordable when set against the better health outcomes for resident immigrants.

P1282 A COST–CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF SCREENING AND TREATMENT FOR CHRONIC HEPATITIS B (CHB) VIRUS INFECTION IN RESIDENT IMMIGRANTS OF AN ITALIAN NORTH-EAST REGION

E. Rosa Rizzotto
;
A. Buja
Methodology
;
D. Martines;A. Vinelli;G. Bardelle;S. Lopatriello;SCRIBANO, LAURA;CAROLI, DONATO;F. De Lazzari;V. Baldo
2014

Abstract

Background and Aims: The epidemiology of hepatitis B in Europe is changing, with migration causing significant increases in prevalence rates. It is of paramount importance to identify the most effective ways to contain the disease. Systematic screening and treatment of migrants for CHB virus infection is likely to be cost-effective, but it is crucial to take into account the significant associated costs and the considerable net investment by governments. The objective of this study is to estimate the health and economic effects of screening for CHB screening among immigrants. Methods: We used the Markov model to examine the costconsequence of screening and treatment vs a no screening strategy in a cohort of 348,991 adult migrants resident in the Veneto Region. The rate of adherence to the HBV screening program was judged to be 40%. The prevalence of HBV infection and the chance of having active CHB was based on our recent screening campaign in Padua involving 465 migrants (table). Likelihood of HBV-related events were obtained from literature. Population 465,322 Age group >20 y 348,991 HBsAg+, n (%) 21,048 (6) Active CHB, n (%) 6,314 (30) Rate of adherence to screening program, n (%) 2,525 (40) Results: The screening-treatment strategy prevented 273 cases of cirrhosis, 18 decompensated cirrhosis, 28 HCC, and 54 CHB related deaths, over a period of 5 years. The incremental cost of the screening strategy totaled 51,597,980 € in five years (0.1% of the Veneto annual health budget). Conclusions: This study provides information useful mainly to policy makers, who need to establish whether the cost generated by a screening strategy are affordable when set against the better health outcomes for resident immigrants.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2852304
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact