In the picture-word interference (PWI) task a picture is presented along with a superimposed distractor word. Participants are required to name the picture while ignoring the distractor. In two PWI experiments we factorially manipulated the case of the distractor (same vs. AltErnAted) and the frequency of the distractor (high vs. low) (Miozzo & Caramazza, 2003; c.f. Mulatti & Coltheart, 2011). Results show the conditions for the case alternation effect to arise, and are discussed within a framework in which distractor processing and target processing compete for accessing to a resource limited mechanism.

Effects of Case Alternation in the Picture-Word Interference Task

MULATTI, CLAUDIO;PERESSOTTI, FRANCESCA;
2011

Abstract

In the picture-word interference (PWI) task a picture is presented along with a superimposed distractor word. Participants are required to name the picture while ignoring the distractor. In two PWI experiments we factorially manipulated the case of the distractor (same vs. AltErnAted) and the frequency of the distractor (high vs. low) (Miozzo & Caramazza, 2003; c.f. Mulatti & Coltheart, 2011). Results show the conditions for the case alternation effect to arise, and are discussed within a framework in which distractor processing and target processing compete for accessing to a resource limited mechanism.
2011
Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3029150
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact