We present and experimentally test a theoretical model of majority threshold determination as a function of voters’ risk preferences. The experimental results confirm the theoretical prediction of a positive correlation between the voter’s risk aversion and the corresponding preferred majority threshold. Furthermore, the experimental results show that a voter’s preferred majority threshold negatively relates to the voter’s confidence about how others will vote. Moreover, in a treatment in which individuals receive a private signal about others’ voting behaviour, the confidence-related motivation of behaviour loses ground to the signal’s strength.

Risk Aversion, Overconfidence and Private Information as Determinants of Majority Thresholds

CORAZZINI, LUCA;
2014

Abstract

We present and experimentally test a theoretical model of majority threshold determination as a function of voters’ risk preferences. The experimental results confirm the theoretical prediction of a positive correlation between the voter’s risk aversion and the corresponding preferred majority threshold. Furthermore, the experimental results show that a voter’s preferred majority threshold negatively relates to the voter’s confidence about how others will vote. Moreover, in a treatment in which individuals receive a private signal about others’ voting behaviour, the confidence-related motivation of behaviour loses ground to the signal’s strength.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
determinants of majority thresholds PER.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (publisher's version)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 293.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
293.23 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3104137
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact