The article deals with the critic that Reinhart Koselleck makes to Otto Brunner’s use of historical sources, which is regarded as a crucial point to understand the methodological reflection of both German speakers authors. This reflection is related, on one hand to the history of political and social concepts; on the other to constitutional history. In addition, it will be argued that methodological discussion had an important role in the very concept of history and the meaning acquired by historio- graphical practice

Diferencia y repetición. Brunner, Koselleck, la história conceptual

CHIGNOLA, SANDRO
2015

Abstract

The article deals with the critic that Reinhart Koselleck makes to Otto Brunner’s use of historical sources, which is regarded as a crucial point to understand the methodological reflection of both German speakers authors. This reflection is related, on one hand to the history of political and social concepts; on the other to constitutional history. In addition, it will be argued that methodological discussion had an important role in the very concept of history and the meaning acquired by historio- graphical practice
2015
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Diferencia y repeticion.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Postprint (accepted version)
Licenza: Accesso gratuito
Dimensione 2.34 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.34 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3166153
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact