The essay explores the exchange between Otto Brunner and Reinhart Koselleck about the use of historical sources in Begriffsgeschichte. Criticizing historicism in Brunner, who asserts the difference between ancient Europe and mo- dernity starting from the idea of a strong epochalization of modern politics as linked to the short time of the State, Koselleck assumes the idea of transformation of political and juridical concepts insisting on their continuity between ancient and modern time. The comparison between the two historians questions the very limits of Western modern political experience
Sulla critica delle fonti della storia costituzionale. Ancora su Otto Brunner, Reinhart Koselleck, la Begriffsgeschichte
CHIGNOLA, SANDRO
2016
Abstract
The essay explores the exchange between Otto Brunner and Reinhart Koselleck about the use of historical sources in Begriffsgeschichte. Criticizing historicism in Brunner, who asserts the difference between ancient Europe and mo- dernity starting from the idea of a strong epochalization of modern politics as linked to the short time of the State, Koselleck assumes the idea of transformation of political and juridical concepts insisting on their continuity between ancient and modern time. The comparison between the two historians questions the very limits of Western modern political experienceFile in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
BrunnerKos_S&P.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Postprint (accepted version)
Licenza:
Accesso libero
Dimensione
474.29 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
474.29 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.