The corpus of Würzburg, attributed to Priscillian, includes a tractate, the Liber de fide de apocryfis, that legitimates the reading of apocryphal writings. Becoming part of a long tradition, the author uses the anonymous citations that he found in canonical texts (e.g. Jud 14-15, Mt 2, 15) to justify the use of non-canonical texts. But he introduces some significant innovation such as the use of Rm 11, 16: taken out of its original context on the salvation of the people of Israel, the biblical quotation is used to represent the distinction of two groups of writings equally inspired: the dilibatio, i.e. the canonical texts, and the massa, i.e. all divine scriptures.
«Dilibatio et massa». L’esegesi priscillianista di Rm 11, 16
VERONESE, MARIA
2017
Abstract
The corpus of Würzburg, attributed to Priscillian, includes a tractate, the Liber de fide de apocryfis, that legitimates the reading of apocryphal writings. Becoming part of a long tradition, the author uses the anonymous citations that he found in canonical texts (e.g. Jud 14-15, Mt 2, 15) to justify the use of non-canonical texts. But he introduces some significant innovation such as the use of Rm 11, 16: taken out of its original context on the salvation of the people of Israel, the biblical quotation is used to represent the distinction of two groups of writings equally inspired: the dilibatio, i.e. the canonical texts, and the massa, i.e. all divine scriptures.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.