This paper discusses the crucial role of visibility and invisibility in socio-spatial acceptability of new renewable energy landscapes. Observing hydropower development in Italian Eastern Alps, we show how visibility and invisibility were purposely used to hide spatial, social and environmental injustices. These strategies, often supported also by environmental and landscape policies, actually limit any possible collaborative 'making' of energy landscapes, which should be based on the transparency of objectives and actions. Among several public policies and private actions, it is possible to identify ten strategies (masking, burying, camouflaging, removing, distracting, staging, digging up, prefiguring, mapping, storytelling) adopted to increase acceptability and prevent conflicts or, on the contrary, to expose the problem, revealing opaque processes and unfair spatial effects. Hiding/showing strategies - and their not directly evident relevant consequences - testify the complexity of the socio-spatial context involved in the process of energy landscape making, which deeply affects social acceptance. This paper sollicits a deeper awareness of the matter of visibility and invisibility in energy policies, which allows to "unveil" what is mendacious and misleading, and drives towards a more sustainable and fairer collaborative making of European landscapes.

Visibility/invisibility in the making of energy landscapes. The case of hydropower in Italian Eastern Alps

CASTIGLIONI, BENEDETTA;
2017

Abstract

This paper discusses the crucial role of visibility and invisibility in socio-spatial acceptability of new renewable energy landscapes. Observing hydropower development in Italian Eastern Alps, we show how visibility and invisibility were purposely used to hide spatial, social and environmental injustices. These strategies, often supported also by environmental and landscape policies, actually limit any possible collaborative 'making' of energy landscapes, which should be based on the transparency of objectives and actions. Among several public policies and private actions, it is possible to identify ten strategies (masking, burying, camouflaging, removing, distracting, staging, digging up, prefiguring, mapping, storytelling) adopted to increase acceptability and prevent conflicts or, on the contrary, to expose the problem, revealing opaque processes and unfair spatial effects. Hiding/showing strategies - and their not directly evident relevant consequences - testify the complexity of the socio-spatial context involved in the process of energy landscape making, which deeply affects social acceptance. This paper sollicits a deeper awareness of the matter of visibility and invisibility in energy policies, which allows to "unveil" what is mendacious and misleading, and drives towards a more sustainable and fairer collaborative making of European landscapes.
2017
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3233870
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact