BACKGROUND: The survival of patients with tumors around the shoulder treated with extra-articular resection, the rates of reconstructions-related complications, and the function of the shoulder cannot be estimated because of limited available data from mainly small published related series and case reports METHODS: We studied 54 patients with tumors around the shoulder treated with extra-articular shoulder resections and proximal humeral megaprosthetic reconstructions from 1985 to 2012. Mean tumor volume was 549 cm3, and the mean length of the proximal humeral resection was 110 mm. Mean follow-up was 7.8 years (range, 3-21 years). We evaluated the outcomes (survival, metastases, recurrences, and function) and the survival and complications of the reconstruction. RESULTS: Survival of patients with malignant tumors was 47%, 38%, and 35%, at 5, 10, and 20 years, respectively. Rates for metastasis and local recurrence were 60% and 18.5%, respectively. Survival was significantly higher for patients without metastases at diagnosis, tumor volume <549 cm3, and type IV resections. Survival of reconstructions was 56% at 10 years and 48% 20 years. Overall, 19 patients (35.2%) experienced 30 complications (55.5%), the most common being soft tissue failures that required subsequent surgery without, however, implant removal. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 25 points, without any significant difference between the types of extra-articular resections. CONCLUSION: Tumor stage and volume as well as type of resection are important predictors of survival of patients with malignant tumors around the shoulder. Survival of the reconstructions is satisfactory; nevertheless, the complication rate is high. The Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score is similar with respect to the type of resection.

Extra-articular shoulder resections: Outcomes of 54 patients

Angelini, Andrea;TROVARELLI, GIULIA;Pala, Elisa;BERIZZI, ANTONIO;RUGGIERI, PIETRO
2017

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The survival of patients with tumors around the shoulder treated with extra-articular resection, the rates of reconstructions-related complications, and the function of the shoulder cannot be estimated because of limited available data from mainly small published related series and case reports METHODS: We studied 54 patients with tumors around the shoulder treated with extra-articular shoulder resections and proximal humeral megaprosthetic reconstructions from 1985 to 2012. Mean tumor volume was 549 cm3, and the mean length of the proximal humeral resection was 110 mm. Mean follow-up was 7.8 years (range, 3-21 years). We evaluated the outcomes (survival, metastases, recurrences, and function) and the survival and complications of the reconstruction. RESULTS: Survival of patients with malignant tumors was 47%, 38%, and 35%, at 5, 10, and 20 years, respectively. Rates for metastasis and local recurrence were 60% and 18.5%, respectively. Survival was significantly higher for patients without metastases at diagnosis, tumor volume <549 cm3, and type IV resections. Survival of reconstructions was 56% at 10 years and 48% 20 years. Overall, 19 patients (35.2%) experienced 30 complications (55.5%), the most common being soft tissue failures that required subsequent surgery without, however, implant removal. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 25 points, without any significant difference between the types of extra-articular resections. CONCLUSION: Tumor stage and volume as well as type of resection are important predictors of survival of patients with malignant tumors around the shoulder. Survival of the reconstructions is satisfactory; nevertheless, the complication rate is high. The Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score is similar with respect to the type of resection.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3239544
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact