Multimedia service providers have to deliver video content through bandwidth limited and error-prone networks with agreed level of perceived video quality to customers for specific applications. To this aim service providers must devise a strategy to monitor the perceived quality and automatically adapt it when necessary. Measuring perceived quality is challenging for service providers. So there is the need for a mapping model to predict perceived video quality from system related quality of service parameters. In this article performance comparison of widely used quality of service to quality of experience mapping models has been presented and optimal solution has been recommended for key quality of service parameters: jitter, delay, packet loss rate and throughput limitation. For this purpose the freely available video quality database ReTRiEVED has been used.
QoS to QoE mapping model for wired/wireless video communication
Battisti F.;
2014
Abstract
Multimedia service providers have to deliver video content through bandwidth limited and error-prone networks with agreed level of perceived video quality to customers for specific applications. To this aim service providers must devise a strategy to monitor the perceived quality and automatically adapt it when necessary. Measuring perceived quality is challenging for service providers. So there is the need for a mapping model to predict perceived video quality from system related quality of service parameters. In this article performance comparison of widely used quality of service to quality of experience mapping models has been presented and optimal solution has been recommended for key quality of service parameters: jitter, delay, packet loss rate and throughput limitation. For this purpose the freely available video quality database ReTRiEVED has been used.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
