During IVGTT the two compartment model performs better than the single compartment one. Here the aim is to test 1 vs 2 compartment model during a more gentle perturbation such an oral test. 1 and 2 compartment minimal model, both unlabeled and labeled, were identified with glucose rate of appearance, i.e. the input of the model, assumed known from a model-independent method. For unlabeled data both models perform similarly while for labeled data the 2 compartment model is better. Among model-based metabolic indices differences were noted in the inhibition of endogenous glucose production due to glucose itself predicted by one and two compartment models.

Glucose kinetics during a meal: One vs two compartment minimal model

Dalla Man C.;Toffolo G.;Cobelli C.
2002

Abstract

During IVGTT the two compartment model performs better than the single compartment one. Here the aim is to test 1 vs 2 compartment model during a more gentle perturbation such an oral test. 1 and 2 compartment minimal model, both unlabeled and labeled, were identified with glucose rate of appearance, i.e. the input of the model, assumed known from a model-independent method. For unlabeled data both models perform similarly while for labeled data the 2 compartment model is better. Among model-based metabolic indices differences were noted in the inhibition of endogenous glucose production due to glucose itself predicted by one and two compartment models.
2002
Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3391604
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact