Many curve-fitting procedures based on the Terzaghi uncoupled consolidation theory have been proposed for the determination of the laboratory coefficient of primary consolidation, cv. This paper presents data from ten oedometer tests performed on clay samples from three different sites, with the cv values having been obtained using four different fitting procedures.The in situ settlements of the clay layers were measured using borehole extensometers. In this way the in situ cv values of the same clay tested in laboratory were determined and compared with the laboratory values. At times, the four methods show considerable differences in the values of cv determinated in the laboratory. Casagrande’s method gives values that differ from those of the other methods and is not always easily usable. The other three methods provide a more consistent evaluation of the values cv. The comparison between in situ and laboratory cv values is not straightforward, since these findings show that the macrostructure of the soil layer influences the behaviour of the whole layer, and the laboratory cv values, apart from the method used for their determination, are sometimes unable to interpret the settlement over time.

Comparison between laboratory and in situ values of the coefficient of primary consolidation cv

CORTELLAZZO, GIAMPAOLO
2002

Abstract

Many curve-fitting procedures based on the Terzaghi uncoupled consolidation theory have been proposed for the determination of the laboratory coefficient of primary consolidation, cv. This paper presents data from ten oedometer tests performed on clay samples from three different sites, with the cv values having been obtained using four different fitting procedures.The in situ settlements of the clay layers were measured using borehole extensometers. In this way the in situ cv values of the same clay tested in laboratory were determined and compared with the laboratory values. At times, the four methods show considerable differences in the values of cv determinated in the laboratory. Casagrande’s method gives values that differ from those of the other methods and is not always easily usable. The other three methods provide a more consistent evaluation of the values cv. The comparison between in situ and laboratory cv values is not straightforward, since these findings show that the macrostructure of the soil layer influences the behaviour of the whole layer, and the laboratory cv values, apart from the method used for their determination, are sometimes unable to interpret the settlement over time.
2002
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/1340731
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact