Harrod’s claim, that the relative prices that solve Sraffa’s “no-surplus” equations reflect the ratios of the amounts exchanged, deserves more than the scanty tribute paid by the author of Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Not only, in fact, does this claim hold true in the simple sense referring to direct, bilateral exchange when there are two commodities (and, in special cases, when there are more than two), but it holds true generally, in the more elaborate sense referring to amounts directly and indirectly exchanged by pairs of industries.

Exchange and Production Equations: Understanding a Debate between Harrod and Sraffa

OPOCHER, ARRIGO
2006

Abstract

Harrod’s claim, that the relative prices that solve Sraffa’s “no-surplus” equations reflect the ratios of the amounts exchanged, deserves more than the scanty tribute paid by the author of Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Not only, in fact, does this claim hold true in the simple sense referring to direct, bilateral exchange when there are two commodities (and, in special cases, when there are more than two), but it holds true generally, in the more elaborate sense referring to amounts directly and indirectly exchanged by pairs of industries.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/1563953
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact