Fertil Steril. 2009 Oct;92(4):1497.e9-12. Epub 2009 Aug 22. Patient with pelvic pains: retroperitoneal fibrosis or pelvic endometriosis? A case report and review of literature. Pezzuto A, Pomini P, Steinkasserer M, Nardelli GB, Minelli L. SourceCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Neonatology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy. Abstract OBJECTIVE: To describe how a hydronephrosis can lead to a difficult differential diagnosis between endometriosis and retroperitoneal fibrosis. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria General Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy. PATIENT(S): The history of a 34-year-old woman revealed the appearance of hydroureteronephrosis on the right side at the 35th week of pregnancy. She had an magnetic resonance imaging scan and was diagnosed with a spread retroperitoneal fibrosis. After 2 months, the patient reported the occurrence of pelvic pain, dyspareunia and dysmenorrhea. She was treated with corticosteroids and tamoxifen with no results. INTERVENTION(S): Laparoscopic surgery. A complete retroperitoneal extirpation was done of an endometriotic nodule of the right broad ligament, near the right ureter (without stenosis). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Reduction of pelvic pain. RESULT(S): She noticed an important decrease of pain. CONCLUSION(S): The cause of hydronephrosis could be a physiologic hydroureteronephrosis, which is the most common cause of dilatation of the urinary tract in pregnancy. The pain symptoms of the patients seemed to be linked to endometriosis and not to retroperitoneal fibrosis. Magnetic resonance imaging sometimes does not enable a correct diagnosis between these two pathologies. Fertile women with suspected fibrosis should undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy by an expert surgeon in retroperitoneal surgery.

Patient with pelvic pains: retroperitoneal fibrosis or pelvic endometriosis ?

NARDELLI, GIOVANNI BATTISTA;
2009

Abstract

Fertil Steril. 2009 Oct;92(4):1497.e9-12. Epub 2009 Aug 22. Patient with pelvic pains: retroperitoneal fibrosis or pelvic endometriosis? A case report and review of literature. Pezzuto A, Pomini P, Steinkasserer M, Nardelli GB, Minelli L. SourceCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Neonatology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy. Abstract OBJECTIVE: To describe how a hydronephrosis can lead to a difficult differential diagnosis between endometriosis and retroperitoneal fibrosis. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria General Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy. PATIENT(S): The history of a 34-year-old woman revealed the appearance of hydroureteronephrosis on the right side at the 35th week of pregnancy. She had an magnetic resonance imaging scan and was diagnosed with a spread retroperitoneal fibrosis. After 2 months, the patient reported the occurrence of pelvic pain, dyspareunia and dysmenorrhea. She was treated with corticosteroids and tamoxifen with no results. INTERVENTION(S): Laparoscopic surgery. A complete retroperitoneal extirpation was done of an endometriotic nodule of the right broad ligament, near the right ureter (without stenosis). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Reduction of pelvic pain. RESULT(S): She noticed an important decrease of pain. CONCLUSION(S): The cause of hydronephrosis could be a physiologic hydroureteronephrosis, which is the most common cause of dilatation of the urinary tract in pregnancy. The pain symptoms of the patients seemed to be linked to endometriosis and not to retroperitoneal fibrosis. Magnetic resonance imaging sometimes does not enable a correct diagnosis between these two pathologies. Fertile women with suspected fibrosis should undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy by an expert surgeon in retroperitoneal surgery.
2009
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2379574
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact