In this paper we consider the NP-hard problem of finding a feasible solution (if any exists) for a generic MIP problem. Trivially, a feasible solution can be defined as an LP-feasible point x that is equal to its rounding. Replacing “equal” with “as close as possible” relative to a suitable distance function, suggests a new type of heuristic, that we call Feasibility Pump (FP). We report computational results on a set of 83 difficult 0-1 MIPs, using the commercial software ILOG-Cplex 8.1 as a benchmark. The outcome is that FP, in spite of its simple foundation, proves competitive with ILOG-Cplex both in terms of speed and quality of the first solution delivered. Interestingly, ILOG-Cplex could not find any feasible solution at the root node for 19 problems in our test-bed, whereas FP was unsuccessful in just 3 cases.

The Feasibility Pump

FISCHETTI, MATTEO;
2005

Abstract

In this paper we consider the NP-hard problem of finding a feasible solution (if any exists) for a generic MIP problem. Trivially, a feasible solution can be defined as an LP-feasible point x that is equal to its rounding. Replacing “equal” with “as close as possible” relative to a suitable distance function, suggests a new type of heuristic, that we call Feasibility Pump (FP). We report computational results on a set of 83 difficult 0-1 MIPs, using the commercial software ILOG-Cplex 8.1 as a benchmark. The outcome is that FP, in spite of its simple foundation, proves competitive with ILOG-Cplex both in terms of speed and quality of the first solution delivered. Interestingly, ILOG-Cplex could not find any feasible solution at the root node for 19 problems in our test-bed, whereas FP was unsuccessful in just 3 cases.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2431994
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 267
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 244
social impact