This study uses landform curvature as an approach for channel network extraction. We consider a study area located in the eastern Italian Alps where a high-quality set of LiDAR data is available and where channel heads and related channel network were mapped in the field. In the analysis we derived 1m DTMs from different ground LiDAR point density, and we used different smoothing factors for the landscape curvature calculation in order to test the suitability of LiDAR point density and the derived curvature maps for the recognition of channel network. This methodology is based on threshold values of curvature calculated as multiples (1 to 3 times) of curvature standard deviation. Our analyses suggested that (i) window size for curvature calculations has to be a function of the size of the features to be detected, (ii) a coarse ground LiDAR point density could be as useful as a finer one for the recognition of main channel network features, (iii) rougher curvature maps are not the optimal since they do not explore a sufficient range at which features occur, while smoother curvature maps overcome this problem and are more appropriate for the extraction of surveyed channels.
Suitability of LiDAR point density and derived landform curvature maps for channel network extraction
PIROTTI, FRANCESCO;TAROLLI, PAOLO
2010
Abstract
This study uses landform curvature as an approach for channel network extraction. We consider a study area located in the eastern Italian Alps where a high-quality set of LiDAR data is available and where channel heads and related channel network were mapped in the field. In the analysis we derived 1m DTMs from different ground LiDAR point density, and we used different smoothing factors for the landscape curvature calculation in order to test the suitability of LiDAR point density and the derived curvature maps for the recognition of channel network. This methodology is based on threshold values of curvature calculated as multiples (1 to 3 times) of curvature standard deviation. Our analyses suggested that (i) window size for curvature calculations has to be a function of the size of the features to be detected, (ii) a coarse ground LiDAR point density could be as useful as a finer one for the recognition of main channel network features, (iii) rougher curvature maps are not the optimal since they do not explore a sufficient range at which features occur, while smoother curvature maps overcome this problem and are more appropriate for the extraction of surveyed channels.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.