Many markers associated with atherosclerosis have been identified in the last 50 years. Some of them act as factors, both mathematically (factors = risk multipliers) and biologically (factors from the latin facient, producing), and others are mere indicators. Among the novel markers, many are strictly connected with inflammation or coagulation. Some studies on these markers have been considered with suspect, because they were conducted on patients rather than on general population, because the number of subjects was low, or because the experimental design was inadequate. Nevertheless, the results of all studies are univocal and similar to those of population-based large-scale studies.Today there is, therefore, general agreement on the role of these novel markers. Although incertitude remains about the underlying pathophysiological mechanism, inflammation and haemostasis are considered as driving forces in the process of atherosclerosis. There is evidence of inflammation in vascular atherosclerotic disease. Activated mast cells are present in human coronary atheromas as well as in the adventitia of coronary arteries of patients with variant angina, the CD3+/DR+ T-lymphocytes are more represented in variant than in stable angina, and inflammatory burden controlateral to a symptomatic carotid stenosis has been detected using high-resolution magnetic resonance. More generally, inflammation and neoangiogenesis play a central role in atherosclerosis and make the atherosclerotic process a continual evolving model. Sometimes (as in the case of subjects with Clamydia pneumoniae or periodontal disease), the inflammatory response to a well-determined infection turns out to be atherogenetic, probably promoting a pro-atherogenic serum lipid profile. In other cases—the great majority—the link of atherogenesis with inflammation is uncertain or even merely presumptive. Urinary albumin excretion (UAE) is an index of glomerular dysfunction and an independent predictor of atherosclerosis and its complications as well. The so-called microalbuminuria (UAE 30–300 mg/day or albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30–300 mg/dL) determined by sensitive techniques is even an earlier predictor. Carotid arteries have been commonly used to demonstrate this association simply because the supraortic district is more accessible to ultrasonographic techniques, and in this site plaques can be detected and measured with extreme precision. UAE is a continuous variable and should not be categorized. Jorgensen et al. just tackle this topic by analysing in a longitudinal perspective 4037 cases from general population after excluding those with diabetes or with known inflammatory disease. Their results, deriving from a very accurate phenotype, indicate that albumin-to-creatinine ratio, even far lower than the usual label of microalbuminuria, is associated with carotid plaque development. Nephropathy sustaining albuminuria must be, of course, a concomitant or an indicator, rather than the cause, of a general endothelial vascular dysfunction, but the mechanism of this association is uncertain, particularly in non-diabetic subjects. Early nephropathy actually correlates with atherosclerosis and its complications (in our general population, top vs. bottom serum creatinine, even in the normal range, increases by the risk of coronary death five-fold in elderly men).8 As a matter of fact, it may be difficult to clarify whether UAE, an expression of renal microcirculatory abnormality, acts as a marker of early nephropathy rather than of atherosclerosis per se. The link between these two conditions must be chronic low-grade inflammation. UAE correlates with fibrinogen, homocysteine, and C-reactive protein, shifting interest from kidney to inflammation/haemostasis or perhaps underlying the flogistic component of both early nephropathy and early atherosclerosis. Tzoulaki et al. in another longitudinal study among a great number of subjects also highlight inflammatory, haemostatic, and rheological biomarkers of incident vascular damage, namely, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, fibrinogen, d-dimer, adhesion molecules, haematocrit, and blood viscosity. The increasing evidence suggests that C-reactive protein and fibrinogen are useful in assessing cardiovascular risk. C-reactive protein has numerous atherogenic effects such as generation of oxygen radicals, clotting, expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, and plaque destabilization. Out of acute occasional inflammation, high levels of high-sensitive C-reactive protein are a marker of vasospasm and have also been related to increased risk, particularly in low-to-intermediate-risk subjects. C-reactive protein responds well to vitamin E, β-blockers, ezetimibe, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin IItype1 (AT1) antagonists, and glitazones, leading to possible prevention, and men with high C-reactive protein could be more responsive to aspirin and statin prophylaxis. C-reactive protein inter-relates with high fibrinogen, a factor that has been found in epidemiological studies and meta-analysis to double the risk of coronary attack and stroke in high-risk men. As fibrinogen is significantly associated with cardiovascular risk also after adjustment for C-reactive protein, these two markers represent different, independent aspects of the inflammatory process. Fibrinogen may mediate its pro-atherogenic effects by increasing plasma viscosity, by stimulating smooth muscle proliferation, and by promoting platelet aggregability via glycoprotein complex IIb–IIIa. As fibrinogen strictly depends on body mass index and smoking, its increase may be in a certain measure prevented by lifestyle measures. Other inflammatory and haemostatic factors have been associated with atherosclerosis. For example, if blood samples are taken with care avoiding release from red cells, homocysteine shows an association with coronary risk. This indicator emerged years ago, when it was demonstrated that its presumptive vascular effect could be prevented by folate administration (unfortunately another study questioned this possibility). Gout is an inflammatory process, so the evidence that serum uric acid (SUA) promotes inflammation was not at all a surprise. SUA is associated/correlated with UAE and may cause vascular injury by decreasing the production of nitric oxide, by impairing endothelial proliferation, by altering signalling transduction, and through a pro-oxidative action. However, whether SUA actually contributes to the disease process or is a mere indicator is still object of debate. In our experience, SUA predicts coronary mortality in general population. Via URAT-1 renal protein, AT1-antagonists have uricosuric properties, a class-specific effect that could potentially be useful in subjects receiving these drugs for indications other than hyperuricaemia (more in general, AT1-antagonists also tend to inhibit inflammation, interleukins, and COX-2/mPGES-1 expression and as a consequence to stabilize atherosclerotic plaques). In conclusion, several novel risk factors, very often related to inflammation or haemostasis, have come to the limelight in the last years and are currently considered risk multipliers and first-line markers of cardiovascular risk. The list of these novel risk factors is largely incomplete. Those shown in Table 1 are indicative of subclinical organ damage or hidden arteriosclerosis of a degree insufficient to produce a clinical disease, but able to alter peripheral vessels and to increase cardiovascular events. In this perspective, they could allow early screening of those subjects who should be addressed to special surveillance or to stronger prophylaxis. Owing to ethical and economical considerations, it is therefore foreseeable that in the near future they all will end up being included in risk charts (as already proposed, for instance, for pulse pressure).

Inflammatory and coagulative markers of atherosclerosis

CASIGLIA, EDOARDO;TIKHONOFF, VALERIE
2007

Abstract

Many markers associated with atherosclerosis have been identified in the last 50 years. Some of them act as factors, both mathematically (factors = risk multipliers) and biologically (factors from the latin facient, producing), and others are mere indicators. Among the novel markers, many are strictly connected with inflammation or coagulation. Some studies on these markers have been considered with suspect, because they were conducted on patients rather than on general population, because the number of subjects was low, or because the experimental design was inadequate. Nevertheless, the results of all studies are univocal and similar to those of population-based large-scale studies.Today there is, therefore, general agreement on the role of these novel markers. Although incertitude remains about the underlying pathophysiological mechanism, inflammation and haemostasis are considered as driving forces in the process of atherosclerosis. There is evidence of inflammation in vascular atherosclerotic disease. Activated mast cells are present in human coronary atheromas as well as in the adventitia of coronary arteries of patients with variant angina, the CD3+/DR+ T-lymphocytes are more represented in variant than in stable angina, and inflammatory burden controlateral to a symptomatic carotid stenosis has been detected using high-resolution magnetic resonance. More generally, inflammation and neoangiogenesis play a central role in atherosclerosis and make the atherosclerotic process a continual evolving model. Sometimes (as in the case of subjects with Clamydia pneumoniae or periodontal disease), the inflammatory response to a well-determined infection turns out to be atherogenetic, probably promoting a pro-atherogenic serum lipid profile. In other cases—the great majority—the link of atherogenesis with inflammation is uncertain or even merely presumptive. Urinary albumin excretion (UAE) is an index of glomerular dysfunction and an independent predictor of atherosclerosis and its complications as well. The so-called microalbuminuria (UAE 30–300 mg/day or albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30–300 mg/dL) determined by sensitive techniques is even an earlier predictor. Carotid arteries have been commonly used to demonstrate this association simply because the supraortic district is more accessible to ultrasonographic techniques, and in this site plaques can be detected and measured with extreme precision. UAE is a continuous variable and should not be categorized. Jorgensen et al. just tackle this topic by analysing in a longitudinal perspective 4037 cases from general population after excluding those with diabetes or with known inflammatory disease. Their results, deriving from a very accurate phenotype, indicate that albumin-to-creatinine ratio, even far lower than the usual label of microalbuminuria, is associated with carotid plaque development. Nephropathy sustaining albuminuria must be, of course, a concomitant or an indicator, rather than the cause, of a general endothelial vascular dysfunction, but the mechanism of this association is uncertain, particularly in non-diabetic subjects. Early nephropathy actually correlates with atherosclerosis and its complications (in our general population, top vs. bottom serum creatinine, even in the normal range, increases by the risk of coronary death five-fold in elderly men).8 As a matter of fact, it may be difficult to clarify whether UAE, an expression of renal microcirculatory abnormality, acts as a marker of early nephropathy rather than of atherosclerosis per se. The link between these two conditions must be chronic low-grade inflammation. UAE correlates with fibrinogen, homocysteine, and C-reactive protein, shifting interest from kidney to inflammation/haemostasis or perhaps underlying the flogistic component of both early nephropathy and early atherosclerosis. Tzoulaki et al. in another longitudinal study among a great number of subjects also highlight inflammatory, haemostatic, and rheological biomarkers of incident vascular damage, namely, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, fibrinogen, d-dimer, adhesion molecules, haematocrit, and blood viscosity. The increasing evidence suggests that C-reactive protein and fibrinogen are useful in assessing cardiovascular risk. C-reactive protein has numerous atherogenic effects such as generation of oxygen radicals, clotting, expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, and plaque destabilization. Out of acute occasional inflammation, high levels of high-sensitive C-reactive protein are a marker of vasospasm and have also been related to increased risk, particularly in low-to-intermediate-risk subjects. C-reactive protein responds well to vitamin E, β-blockers, ezetimibe, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin IItype1 (AT1) antagonists, and glitazones, leading to possible prevention, and men with high C-reactive protein could be more responsive to aspirin and statin prophylaxis. C-reactive protein inter-relates with high fibrinogen, a factor that has been found in epidemiological studies and meta-analysis to double the risk of coronary attack and stroke in high-risk men. As fibrinogen is significantly associated with cardiovascular risk also after adjustment for C-reactive protein, these two markers represent different, independent aspects of the inflammatory process. Fibrinogen may mediate its pro-atherogenic effects by increasing plasma viscosity, by stimulating smooth muscle proliferation, and by promoting platelet aggregability via glycoprotein complex IIb–IIIa. As fibrinogen strictly depends on body mass index and smoking, its increase may be in a certain measure prevented by lifestyle measures. Other inflammatory and haemostatic factors have been associated with atherosclerosis. For example, if blood samples are taken with care avoiding release from red cells, homocysteine shows an association with coronary risk. This indicator emerged years ago, when it was demonstrated that its presumptive vascular effect could be prevented by folate administration (unfortunately another study questioned this possibility). Gout is an inflammatory process, so the evidence that serum uric acid (SUA) promotes inflammation was not at all a surprise. SUA is associated/correlated with UAE and may cause vascular injury by decreasing the production of nitric oxide, by impairing endothelial proliferation, by altering signalling transduction, and through a pro-oxidative action. However, whether SUA actually contributes to the disease process or is a mere indicator is still object of debate. In our experience, SUA predicts coronary mortality in general population. Via URAT-1 renal protein, AT1-antagonists have uricosuric properties, a class-specific effect that could potentially be useful in subjects receiving these drugs for indications other than hyperuricaemia (more in general, AT1-antagonists also tend to inhibit inflammation, interleukins, and COX-2/mPGES-1 expression and as a consequence to stabilize atherosclerotic plaques). In conclusion, several novel risk factors, very often related to inflammation or haemostasis, have come to the limelight in the last years and are currently considered risk multipliers and first-line markers of cardiovascular risk. The list of these novel risk factors is largely incomplete. Those shown in Table 1 are indicative of subclinical organ damage or hidden arteriosclerosis of a degree insufficient to produce a clinical disease, but able to alter peripheral vessels and to increase cardiovascular events. In this perspective, they could allow early screening of those subjects who should be addressed to special surveillance or to stronger prophylaxis. Owing to ethical and economical considerations, it is therefore foreseeable that in the near future they all will end up being included in risk charts (as already proposed, for instance, for pulse pressure).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2441044
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact