AIMS: To investigate the relation between aortic elastic properties and size in bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs). METHODS AND RESULTS: 127 BAV outpatients (121 males; age 23 +/- 10 years) with no or mild valvular impairment, were recruited with 114 control subjects comparable for age, gender, and body size. Aortic distensibility (DIS) and stiffness index (SI) were derived by M-mode evaluation of the aortic root together with blood pressure measured by cuff sphygmomanometer. BAVs vs. controls had increased aortic diameter (P < 0.0001), higher systolic (P = 0.02) and pulse (P = 0.04) pressures. DIS was lower in BAVs than in controls (4.71 +/- 3.67 vs. 7.44 +/- 3.94 10(-6) cm(2)dyne(-1), respectively; P < 0.0001) and SI was greater in BAVs (7.21 +/- 4.93 vs. 3.57 +/- 1.88, respectively; P < 0.0001). Definite impairment in aortic elasticity was present in 53 (42%) BAVs. Both DIS and SI were related (P < 0.0001) to aortic size in BAVs and controls. After adjusting for aortic size and blood pressure, the regression relations between SI and aortic diameter of BAVs were significantly different from controls (P = 0.0052). CONCLUSION: Abnormal aortic elasticity is a common finding in BAVs with no or mild aortic valve impairment. However, impaired aortic stiffness is not due to aortic dilation. Simple assessment of aortic size may thus fail to identify early abnormal load bearing characteristics of the aortic wall in BAVs.

Aortic elasticity and size in bicuspid aortic valve syndrome.

BASSO, CRISTINA;CREPALDI, GAETANO;THIENE, GAETANO
2008

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the relation between aortic elastic properties and size in bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs). METHODS AND RESULTS: 127 BAV outpatients (121 males; age 23 +/- 10 years) with no or mild valvular impairment, were recruited with 114 control subjects comparable for age, gender, and body size. Aortic distensibility (DIS) and stiffness index (SI) were derived by M-mode evaluation of the aortic root together with blood pressure measured by cuff sphygmomanometer. BAVs vs. controls had increased aortic diameter (P < 0.0001), higher systolic (P = 0.02) and pulse (P = 0.04) pressures. DIS was lower in BAVs than in controls (4.71 +/- 3.67 vs. 7.44 +/- 3.94 10(-6) cm(2)dyne(-1), respectively; P < 0.0001) and SI was greater in BAVs (7.21 +/- 4.93 vs. 3.57 +/- 1.88, respectively; P < 0.0001). Definite impairment in aortic elasticity was present in 53 (42%) BAVs. Both DIS and SI were related (P < 0.0001) to aortic size in BAVs and controls. After adjusting for aortic size and blood pressure, the regression relations between SI and aortic diameter of BAVs were significantly different from controls (P = 0.0052). CONCLUSION: Abnormal aortic elasticity is a common finding in BAVs with no or mild aortic valve impairment. However, impaired aortic stiffness is not due to aortic dilation. Simple assessment of aortic size may thus fail to identify early abnormal load bearing characteristics of the aortic wall in BAVs.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2447067
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 41
  • Scopus 197
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 168
social impact