A crucial point in the implementation of meshless methods such as the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method is the evaluation of the domain integrals arising over circles in the discrete local weak form of the governing partial differential equation. In this paper we make a comparison between the product Gauss numerical quadrature rules, which are very popular in the MLPG literature, with cubature formulas specifically constructed for the approximation of an integral over the unit disk, but not yet applied in the MLPG method, namely the spherical, the circularly symmetrical and the symmetric cubature formulas. The same accuracy obtained with 64 x 64 points in the product Gauss rules may be obtained with symmetric quadrature formulas with very few points

Product Gauss quadrature rules vs . cubature rules in the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method

MAZZIA, ANNAMARIA;PINI, GIORGIO
2010

Abstract

A crucial point in the implementation of meshless methods such as the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method is the evaluation of the domain integrals arising over circles in the discrete local weak form of the governing partial differential equation. In this paper we make a comparison between the product Gauss numerical quadrature rules, which are very popular in the MLPG literature, with cubature formulas specifically constructed for the approximation of an integral over the unit disk, but not yet applied in the MLPG method, namely the spherical, the circularly symmetrical and the symmetric cubature formulas. The same accuracy obtained with 64 x 64 points in the product Gauss rules may be obtained with symmetric quadrature formulas with very few points
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2448591
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact