BACKGROUND: Monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) formation following lignocaine injection has recently been proposed as a simple dynamic liver function test based on a single measurement of its serum concentration. AIM: To determine the optimal sampling time for MEGX determination. METHODS: A modelling analysis of lignocaine and MEGX kinetics was performed in seven normals and in four patients with compensated liver cirrhosis; a similar study was performed in 74 cirrhotic patients, divided into two groups according to disease severity (Pugh score). RESULTS: Only the MEGX fractional formation rate (kf) and formation delay (tau) were significantly altered in cirrhotic patients compared to normals: kf = 0.15 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.32 +/- 0.10 min-1 (mean +/- s.d.); tau = 7.7 +/- 2.0 vs. 3.9 +/- 2.9 min-1. A good correlation was found between kf and late (r = 0.82) but not early (r = 0.63) serum MEGX formation, suggesting that late measurements for the clinical MEGX test are preferred. In the second part of our investigation, by discriminant analysis of MEGX test data for 74 cirrhotic patients, the late MEGX concentrations gave the best discrimination between the two classes. In particular, the 60 min MEGX concentration showed the best diagnostic accuracy (81%), sensitivity (75%) and specificity (84%). The association of this with other MEGX parameters, either singly or derived from the whole curve measurements, did not improve the performance of the method. CONCLUSION: The MEGX test, based on a single determination 60 min after lignocaine injection, may be regarded as a simple and sensitive quantitative liver function test.

The monoethylglycinexylidide test for grading of liver cirrhosis

FABRIS, LUCA;TOFFOLO, GIANNA MARIA;CASAGRANDE, FABIO;LIRUSSI, FLAVIO;COBELLI, CLAUDIO;OKOLICSANYI, LAJOS
1999

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) formation following lignocaine injection has recently been proposed as a simple dynamic liver function test based on a single measurement of its serum concentration. AIM: To determine the optimal sampling time for MEGX determination. METHODS: A modelling analysis of lignocaine and MEGX kinetics was performed in seven normals and in four patients with compensated liver cirrhosis; a similar study was performed in 74 cirrhotic patients, divided into two groups according to disease severity (Pugh score). RESULTS: Only the MEGX fractional formation rate (kf) and formation delay (tau) were significantly altered in cirrhotic patients compared to normals: kf = 0.15 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.32 +/- 0.10 min-1 (mean +/- s.d.); tau = 7.7 +/- 2.0 vs. 3.9 +/- 2.9 min-1. A good correlation was found between kf and late (r = 0.82) but not early (r = 0.63) serum MEGX formation, suggesting that late measurements for the clinical MEGX test are preferred. In the second part of our investigation, by discriminant analysis of MEGX test data for 74 cirrhotic patients, the late MEGX concentrations gave the best discrimination between the two classes. In particular, the 60 min MEGX concentration showed the best diagnostic accuracy (81%), sensitivity (75%) and specificity (84%). The association of this with other MEGX parameters, either singly or derived from the whole curve measurements, did not improve the performance of the method. CONCLUSION: The MEGX test, based on a single determination 60 min after lignocaine injection, may be regarded as a simple and sensitive quantitative liver function test.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11577/2455352
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact