Various models have been proposed to quantitate from [18F]-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) data glucose regional metabolic rate. We evaluate here four models, a three-rate constants (3K) model, a four-rate constants (4K) model, an heterogeneous model (TH) and a spectral analysis (SA) model. The data base consists of [18F]FDG dynamic data obtained in the myocardium and brain gray and white matter. All models were identified by nonlinear weighted least squares with weights chosen optimally. We show that: 1) 3K and 4K models are indistinguishable in terms of parsimony criteria and choice should be made on parameter precision and physiological plausibility; in the gray matter a more complex model than the 3K one is resolvable; 2) the TH model is resolvable in the gray but not in the white matter; 3) the classic SA approach has some unnecessary hypotheses built in and can be in principle misleading; we propose here a new SA model which is more theoretically sound; 4) this new SA approach supports the use of a 3K model in the heart with a 60 min experimental period; it also indicates that heterogeneity in the brain is modest in the white matter; 5) [18F]FDG fractional uptake estimates of the four models are very close in the heart, but not in the brain; 6) a higher than 60 min experimental time is preferable for brain studies.

Evaluation of compartmental and spectral analysis models of [18F]FDG kinetics for heart and brain studies with PET

BERTOLDO, ALESSANDRA;COBELLI, CLAUDIO
1998

Abstract

Various models have been proposed to quantitate from [18F]-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) data glucose regional metabolic rate. We evaluate here four models, a three-rate constants (3K) model, a four-rate constants (4K) model, an heterogeneous model (TH) and a spectral analysis (SA) model. The data base consists of [18F]FDG dynamic data obtained in the myocardium and brain gray and white matter. All models were identified by nonlinear weighted least squares with weights chosen optimally. We show that: 1) 3K and 4K models are indistinguishable in terms of parsimony criteria and choice should be made on parameter precision and physiological plausibility; in the gray matter a more complex model than the 3K one is resolvable; 2) the TH model is resolvable in the gray but not in the white matter; 3) the classic SA approach has some unnecessary hypotheses built in and can be in principle misleading; we propose here a new SA model which is more theoretically sound; 4) this new SA approach supports the use of a 3K model in the heart with a 60 min experimental period; it also indicates that heterogeneity in the brain is modest in the white matter; 5) [18F]FDG fractional uptake estimates of the four models are very close in the heart, but not in the brain; 6) a higher than 60 min experimental time is preferable for brain studies.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2458673
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 57
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 53
social impact