The Hebbian view of word representation is challenged by findings of task (level of processing)-dependent, event-related potential patterns that do not support the notion of a fixed set of neurons representing a given word. With cross-language phonological reliability encoding more asymmetrical left hemisphere activity is evoked than with word comprehension. Tills suggests a dynamical view of the brain as a self-organizing, connective-adjusting system.
Word vs. task representation in neural networks.
ANGRILLI, ALESSANDRO;STEGAGNO, LUCIANO;
1999
Abstract
The Hebbian view of word representation is challenged by findings of task (level of processing)-dependent, event-related potential patterns that do not support the notion of a fixed set of neurons representing a given word. With cross-language phonological reliability encoding more asymmetrical left hemisphere activity is evoked than with word comprehension. Tills suggests a dynamical view of the brain as a self-organizing, connective-adjusting system.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Elbert_1999_Word_versus_task.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Postprint (accepted version)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
99.47 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
99.47 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
