Althoughfacilitationofthecorticospinal(CS)systemduringactionobservationisawidelyaccepted phenomenon,itisstillcontroversialiffacilitationreflectsthereplicaofobservedmovementkinematics or thetensiontoachieveaparticulargoal.Inthisstudy,transcranialmagneticstimulation(TMS)- inducedmotorevokedpotentials(MEPs)wererecordedfromtheabductordigitiminimi(ADM)andthe first dorsalinterosseus(FDI)muscleswhileparticipant–volunteersobservedamodelgraspingasmall target elicitingaprecisiongriporalargetargetelicitingawholehandgraspdirectedtowardanisolated object orflankedbydifferentsizedobjects(i.e.,distractor).Adetailedmovementanalysisrevealedthat the model’skinematicswereinfluencedbythedistractor’ssize.Videoclipsfilmingthescenewere edited insuchawaythatthedistractorwasremovedfromthescene.Participant–volunteerswere asked toobserveactionscharacterizedbythesamegoalbutperformedusingdifferentkinematical patterns.Althoughthedifferencesinmovementkinematicswerenotnoticedbytheparticipant- volunteers,theynonethelesseliciteddistinctconfigurationsofcorticospinalactivation.Detailedmotor matchingseemstorecruitthesamemusclesintheonlookerasinthepersonactuallycarryingoutthe action duringobservationofgraspingactions.Theseeffectsappeartobeelicitedbyverysubtle, imperceptibleaspectsofobservedactionspointingtoafinelytunedmechanismthatspecifically encodesbodyparts.
Motor cortex excitability is tightly coupled to observed movements
SARTORI, LUISA;CASTIELLO, UMBERTO
2012
Abstract
Althoughfacilitationofthecorticospinal(CS)systemduringactionobservationisawidelyaccepted phenomenon,itisstillcontroversialiffacilitationreflectsthereplicaofobservedmovementkinematics or thetensiontoachieveaparticulargoal.Inthisstudy,transcranialmagneticstimulation(TMS)- inducedmotorevokedpotentials(MEPs)wererecordedfromtheabductordigitiminimi(ADM)andthe first dorsalinterosseus(FDI)muscleswhileparticipant–volunteersobservedamodelgraspingasmall target elicitingaprecisiongriporalargetargetelicitingawholehandgraspdirectedtowardanisolated object orflankedbydifferentsizedobjects(i.e.,distractor).Adetailedmovementanalysisrevealedthat the model’skinematicswereinfluencedbythedistractor’ssize.Videoclipsfilmingthescenewere edited insuchawaythatthedistractorwasremovedfromthescene.Participant–volunteerswere asked toobserveactionscharacterizedbythesamegoalbutperformedusingdifferentkinematical patterns.Althoughthedifferencesinmovementkinematicswerenotnoticedbytheparticipant- volunteers,theynonethelesseliciteddistinctconfigurationsofcorticospinalactivation.Detailedmotor matchingseemstorecruitthesamemusclesintheonlookerasinthepersonactuallycarryingoutthe action duringobservationofgraspingactions.Theseeffectsappeartobeelicitedbyverysubtle, imperceptibleaspectsofobservedactionspointingtoafinelytunedmechanismthatspecifically encodesbodyparts.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Neuropsychologia_Sartori_2012.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza:
Accesso privato - non pubblico
Dimensione
585.52 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
585.52 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




