Althoughfacilitationofthecorticospinal(CS)systemduringactionobservationisawidelyaccepted phenomenon,itisstillcontroversialiffacilitationreflectsthereplicaofobservedmovementkinematics or thetensiontoachieveaparticulargoal.Inthisstudy,transcranialmagneticstimulation(TMS)- inducedmotorevokedpotentials(MEPs)wererecordedfromtheabductordigitiminimi(ADM)andthe first dorsalinterosseus(FDI)muscleswhileparticipant–volunteersobservedamodelgraspingasmall target elicitingaprecisiongriporalargetargetelicitingawholehandgraspdirectedtowardanisolated object orflankedbydifferentsizedobjects(i.e.,distractor).Adetailedmovementanalysisrevealedthat the model’skinematicswereinfluencedbythedistractor’ssize.Videoclipsfilmingthescenewere edited insuchawaythatthedistractorwasremovedfromthescene.Participant–volunteerswere asked toobserveactionscharacterizedbythesamegoalbutperformedusingdifferentkinematical patterns.Althoughthedifferencesinmovementkinematicswerenotnoticedbytheparticipant- volunteers,theynonethelesseliciteddistinctconfigurationsofcorticospinalactivation.Detailedmotor matchingseemstorecruitthesamemusclesintheonlookerasinthepersonactuallycarryingoutthe action duringobservationofgraspingactions.Theseeffectsappeartobeelicitedbyverysubtle, imperceptibleaspectsofobservedactionspointingtoafinelytunedmechanismthatspecifically encodesbodyparts.

Motor cortex excitability is tightly coupled to observed movements

SARTORI, LUISA;CASTIELLO, UMBERTO
2012

Abstract

Althoughfacilitationofthecorticospinal(CS)systemduringactionobservationisawidelyaccepted phenomenon,itisstillcontroversialiffacilitationreflectsthereplicaofobservedmovementkinematics or thetensiontoachieveaparticulargoal.Inthisstudy,transcranialmagneticstimulation(TMS)- inducedmotorevokedpotentials(MEPs)wererecordedfromtheabductordigitiminimi(ADM)andthe first dorsalinterosseus(FDI)muscleswhileparticipant–volunteersobservedamodelgraspingasmall target elicitingaprecisiongriporalargetargetelicitingawholehandgraspdirectedtowardanisolated object orflankedbydifferentsizedobjects(i.e.,distractor).Adetailedmovementanalysisrevealedthat the model’skinematicswereinfluencedbythedistractor’ssize.Videoclipsfilmingthescenewere edited insuchawaythatthedistractorwasremovedfromthescene.Participant–volunteerswere asked toobserveactionscharacterizedbythesamegoalbutperformedusingdifferentkinematical patterns.Althoughthedifferencesinmovementkinematicswerenotnoticedbytheparticipant- volunteers,theynonethelesseliciteddistinctconfigurationsofcorticospinalactivation.Detailedmotor matchingseemstorecruitthesamemusclesintheonlookerasinthepersonactuallycarryingoutthe action duringobservationofgraspingactions.Theseeffectsappeartobeelicitedbyverysubtle, imperceptibleaspectsofobservedactionspointingtoafinelytunedmechanismthatspecifically encodesbodyparts.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2493853
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 33
social impact