Althoughfacilitationofthecorticospinal(CS)systemduringactionobservationisawidelyaccepted phenomenon,itisstillcontroversialiffacilitationreflectsthereplicaofobservedmovementkinematics or thetensiontoachieveaparticulargoal.Inthisstudy,transcranialmagneticstimulation(TMS)- inducedmotorevokedpotentials(MEPs)wererecordedfromtheabductordigitiminimi(ADM)andthe first dorsalinterosseus(FDI)muscleswhileparticipant–volunteersobservedamodelgraspingasmall target elicitingaprecisiongriporalargetargetelicitingawholehandgraspdirectedtowardanisolated object orflankedbydifferentsizedobjects(i.e.,distractor).Adetailedmovementanalysisrevealedthat the model’skinematicswereinfluencedbythedistractor’ssize.Videoclipsfilmingthescenewere edited insuchawaythatthedistractorwasremovedfromthescene.Participant–volunteerswere asked toobserveactionscharacterizedbythesamegoalbutperformedusingdifferentkinematical patterns.Althoughthedifferencesinmovementkinematicswerenotnoticedbytheparticipant- volunteers,theynonethelesseliciteddistinctconfigurationsofcorticospinalactivation.Detailedmotor matchingseemstorecruitthesamemusclesintheonlookerasinthepersonactuallycarryingoutthe action duringobservationofgraspingactions.Theseeffectsappeartobeelicitedbyverysubtle, imperceptibleaspectsofobservedactionspointingtoafinelytunedmechanismthatspecifically encodesbodyparts.

Motor cortex excitability is tightly coupled to observed movements

SARTORI, LUISA;CASTIELLO, UMBERTO
2012

Abstract

Althoughfacilitationofthecorticospinal(CS)systemduringactionobservationisawidelyaccepted phenomenon,itisstillcontroversialiffacilitationreflectsthereplicaofobservedmovementkinematics or thetensiontoachieveaparticulargoal.Inthisstudy,transcranialmagneticstimulation(TMS)- inducedmotorevokedpotentials(MEPs)wererecordedfromtheabductordigitiminimi(ADM)andthe first dorsalinterosseus(FDI)muscleswhileparticipant–volunteersobservedamodelgraspingasmall target elicitingaprecisiongriporalargetargetelicitingawholehandgraspdirectedtowardanisolated object orflankedbydifferentsizedobjects(i.e.,distractor).Adetailedmovementanalysisrevealedthat the model’skinematicswereinfluencedbythedistractor’ssize.Videoclipsfilmingthescenewere edited insuchawaythatthedistractorwasremovedfromthescene.Participant–volunteerswere asked toobserveactionscharacterizedbythesamegoalbutperformedusingdifferentkinematical patterns.Althoughthedifferencesinmovementkinematicswerenotnoticedbytheparticipant- volunteers,theynonethelesseliciteddistinctconfigurationsofcorticospinalactivation.Detailedmotor matchingseemstorecruitthesamemusclesintheonlookerasinthepersonactuallycarryingoutthe action duringobservationofgraspingactions.Theseeffectsappeartobeelicitedbyverysubtle, imperceptibleaspectsofobservedactionspointingtoafinelytunedmechanismthatspecifically encodesbodyparts.
2012
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Neuropsychologia_Sartori_2012.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza: Accesso privato - non pubblico
Dimensione 585.52 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
585.52 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2493853
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 17
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
  • OpenAlex 43
social impact