The following contribution interprets the ICJ decision in the case of Jurisdictional Immunities of the State in a broader picture. Even if in the traditional view immunity is conceived as a ‘procedural’ rule, as the Court upheld in the judgment, however this is not the only way to address this topic. State immunity can be interpreted as a substitute for other more sensitive questions, namely the definition of ‘state’, its prerogatives, and the individuals as right holders under international law. This approach points out a different rationale under state immunity, leading to major practical consequences in terms of the assessment of international jurisdiction
The Dark Side of Immunity: Is There Any Individual Right for Activities Jure Imperii?
SARZO, MATTEO
2013
Abstract
The following contribution interprets the ICJ decision in the case of Jurisdictional Immunities of the State in a broader picture. Even if in the traditional view immunity is conceived as a ‘procedural’ rule, as the Court upheld in the judgment, however this is not the only way to address this topic. State immunity can be interpreted as a substitute for other more sensitive questions, namely the definition of ‘state’, its prerogatives, and the individuals as right holders under international law. This approach points out a different rationale under state immunity, leading to major practical consequences in terms of the assessment of international jurisdiction| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Article (1).pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza:
Accesso libero
Dimensione
612.59 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
612.59 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




