Animal Assisted Interventions (AAI) with dogs are becoming popular worldwide but there is a lack of scientific data on dog selection procedures that prevents the organizations involved from adopting a uniform assessment method. In the absence of legal regulations and common guidelines, dog currently engage in diverse activities, some of which may pose more of a concern for their welfare than others. The present study sought to standardize and validate a selection protocol of dogs involved in AAI and to make it available to interested Italian institutions. To meet this aim, we enrolled dogs already working in AAI and qualified by their handlers as fully suitable (N = 20) or suitable with reserve (N = 20) and non-worker pet dogs (N = 20) in this study. Each dog underwent a behavioral examination followed by role-playing, simulating an AAI session, presenting various conditions and unexpected stimuli possibly occurring in AAI. In both procedures, blinded experts judged the suitability of dogs evaluating controllability, reliability and predictability of their social behavior and considering possible concerns regarding safety or welfare of patients and of the dogs, themselves. Concurrent validity between procedures was fair, whereas reasons for dogs’ allocation resulted in moderate accordance for dogs being aggressive, fearful or avoidant of unknown person. Moreover, dogs judged suitable, suitable with reserve or not suitable by the experts significantly differed for the relative duration of negative interactions with unknown person, fear and aggressiveness expressed in the role-playing. Differences in the ability to cope with stressful situations possibly occurring in AAI was unnoticeable with the present protocol and stress signals shown by dogs during the role-playing were judged by the experts or by the handlers not to differ between dogs. Given our results, the present protocol could be easily and properly adopted to identify dogs’ behavioral prerequisites for AAI. In order for the procedure to work properly, each dyad (dog /handler) should undergo behavioral examination and role-playing simulation in sequence.

Validation of a selection protocol of dogs involved in Animal Assisted Intervention.

MONGILLO, PAOLO;PITTERI, ELISA;ADAMELLI, SERENA;BONICHINI, SABRINA;MARINELLI, LIETA
2015

Abstract

Animal Assisted Interventions (AAI) with dogs are becoming popular worldwide but there is a lack of scientific data on dog selection procedures that prevents the organizations involved from adopting a uniform assessment method. In the absence of legal regulations and common guidelines, dog currently engage in diverse activities, some of which may pose more of a concern for their welfare than others. The present study sought to standardize and validate a selection protocol of dogs involved in AAI and to make it available to interested Italian institutions. To meet this aim, we enrolled dogs already working in AAI and qualified by their handlers as fully suitable (N = 20) or suitable with reserve (N = 20) and non-worker pet dogs (N = 20) in this study. Each dog underwent a behavioral examination followed by role-playing, simulating an AAI session, presenting various conditions and unexpected stimuli possibly occurring in AAI. In both procedures, blinded experts judged the suitability of dogs evaluating controllability, reliability and predictability of their social behavior and considering possible concerns regarding safety or welfare of patients and of the dogs, themselves. Concurrent validity between procedures was fair, whereas reasons for dogs’ allocation resulted in moderate accordance for dogs being aggressive, fearful or avoidant of unknown person. Moreover, dogs judged suitable, suitable with reserve or not suitable by the experts significantly differed for the relative duration of negative interactions with unknown person, fear and aggressiveness expressed in the role-playing. Differences in the ability to cope with stressful situations possibly occurring in AAI was unnoticeable with the present protocol and stress signals shown by dogs during the role-playing were judged by the experts or by the handlers not to differ between dogs. Given our results, the present protocol could be easily and properly adopted to identify dogs’ behavioral prerequisites for AAI. In order for the procedure to work properly, each dyad (dog /handler) should undergo behavioral examination and role-playing simulation in sequence.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2989515
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact