Air source heat pumps have a well known unfavorable characteristic: in the coldest period of the year, when the building heating load is at maximum, the heat pump capacity is reduced. A possible solution is to size the heat pump to cover only a fraction of the peak load using a second heat generator in “hybrid heat pump system”. In this study a dynamic model of a hybrid system was built and several seasonal simulations were carried out (considering two different climates) to study how the choice of the cut off temperature can influence the annual efficiency of the system and to understand if a bivalent parallel plant can lead to energy savings compared to a bivalent alternative system. With both the considered climates, when a large size heat pump is selected (low bivalent temperature), there might be no benefits by setting a cut off temperature lower than the bivalent temperature, and the differences between the energy performances of the bivalent alternative system and those of the bivalent parallel system are negligible. On the other hand, when a low size heat pump is preferred (high bivalent temperature), the bivalent parallel system can lead to appreciable energy savings compared to a bivalent alternative plant. The main economic advantages of a hybrid system, with respect to the monovalent heat-pump plant, comes from the lower annual electric and gas energy needs.

Annual simulation, energy and economic analysis of hybrid heat pump systems for residential buildings

BAGARELLA, GIACOMO;LAZZARIN, RENATO;NORO, MARCO
2016

Abstract

Air source heat pumps have a well known unfavorable characteristic: in the coldest period of the year, when the building heating load is at maximum, the heat pump capacity is reduced. A possible solution is to size the heat pump to cover only a fraction of the peak load using a second heat generator in “hybrid heat pump system”. In this study a dynamic model of a hybrid system was built and several seasonal simulations were carried out (considering two different climates) to study how the choice of the cut off temperature can influence the annual efficiency of the system and to understand if a bivalent parallel plant can lead to energy savings compared to a bivalent alternative system. With both the considered climates, when a large size heat pump is selected (low bivalent temperature), there might be no benefits by setting a cut off temperature lower than the bivalent temperature, and the differences between the energy performances of the bivalent alternative system and those of the bivalent parallel system are negligible. On the other hand, when a low size heat pump is preferred (high bivalent temperature), the bivalent parallel system can lead to appreciable energy savings compared to a bivalent alternative plant. The main economic advantages of a hybrid system, with respect to the monovalent heat-pump plant, comes from the lower annual electric and gas energy needs.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3190984
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 45
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 38
social impact