The motion of partially wetting liquid drops in contact with a solid surface is strongly affected by contact angle hysteresis and interfacial pinning. However, the majority of models proposed for drops sliding over chemical surface patterns consistently neglect the difference between advancing and receding contact angles. In this article, we present a joint experimental and numerical study of the interaction of gravity-driven drops with a chemical step formed at the junction between a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic region. It demonstrates the strong impact of a contact angle hysteresis contrast on the motion of drops at a linear chemical step. Surprisingly, the smallest driving force required to drag the drop across the step onto the lower hydrophobic surface is not observed at a right angle of incidence. Our model reveals that the non-monotonous response of this passive drop 'filter' is solely due to the higher advancing contact angle on the lower surface, and creates an instance where drop motion is affected by dissipation at the contact line rather than by surface energy.

Deviation of sliding drops at a chemical step

SEMPREBON, CIRO
;
VARAGNOLO, SILVIA;FILIPPI, DANIELE;PIERNO, MATTEO AMBROGIO PAOLO;MISTURA, GIAMPAOLO
2016

Abstract

The motion of partially wetting liquid drops in contact with a solid surface is strongly affected by contact angle hysteresis and interfacial pinning. However, the majority of models proposed for drops sliding over chemical surface patterns consistently neglect the difference between advancing and receding contact angles. In this article, we present a joint experimental and numerical study of the interaction of gravity-driven drops with a chemical step formed at the junction between a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic region. It demonstrates the strong impact of a contact angle hysteresis contrast on the motion of drops at a linear chemical step. Surprisingly, the smallest driving force required to drag the drop across the step onto the lower hydrophobic surface is not observed at a right angle of incidence. Our model reveals that the non-monotonous response of this passive drop 'filter' is solely due to the higher advancing contact angle on the lower surface, and creates an instance where drop motion is affected by dissipation at the contact line rather than by surface energy.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11577/3206945
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact