We introduce two symmetrized versions of the popular divide-and choose mechanism for the allocation of a collectively owned indivisible good among two agents when monetary compensation is available. Our proposals retain the simplicity of divide-and-choose and correct its expostasymmetry. When there is complete information, i.e., agents know each other well, both mechanisms implement in subgame perfect equilibria a unique allocation that would be obtained by a balanced market. The results hold for general continuous preferences that may not be quasi-linear.

Divide and compromise

NICOLO', ANTONIO;
2017

Abstract

We introduce two symmetrized versions of the popular divide-and choose mechanism for the allocation of a collectively owned indivisible good among two agents when monetary compensation is available. Our proposals retain the simplicity of divide-and-choose and correct its expostasymmetry. When there is complete information, i.e., agents know each other well, both mechanisms implement in subgame perfect equilibria a unique allocation that would be obtained by a balanced market. The results hold for general continuous preferences that may not be quasi-linear.
2017
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3227066
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact