In many application scenarios digital images play a basic role and often it is important to assess if their content is realistic or has been manipulated to mislead watcher's opinion. Image forensics tools provide answers to similar questions. This paper, in particular, focuses on the problem of detecting if a feigned image has been created by cloning an area of the image onto another zone to make a duplication or to cancel something awkward. The proposed method is based on SIFT features and allows both to understand which are the image points involved in the counterfeit attack and, furthermore, to recover the parameters of the geometric transformation. Experimental results are provided to witness the powerfulness of the proposed technique.

Geometric Tampering Estimation by Means of a SIFT-based Forensic Analysis

BALLAN, LAMBERTO;
2010

Abstract

In many application scenarios digital images play a basic role and often it is important to assess if their content is realistic or has been manipulated to mislead watcher's opinion. Image forensics tools provide answers to similar questions. This paper, in particular, focuses on the problem of detecting if a feigned image has been created by cloning an area of the image onto another zone to make a duplication or to cancel something awkward. The proposed method is based on SIFT features and allows both to understand which are the image points involved in the counterfeit attack and, furthermore, to recover the parameters of the geometric transformation. Experimental results are provided to witness the powerfulness of the proposed technique.
2010
Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3242029
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 53
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact