The aim of this study was to critically examine the influence of body size on maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O 2 max) in boys and men using body mass (BM), estimated fat-free mass (FFM), and estimated lower leg muscle volume (Vol) as the separate scaling variables. V̇O 2 max and an in vivo measurement of Vol were assessed in 15 boys and 14 men. The FFM was estimated after percentage body fat had been predicted from population-specific skinfold measurements. By using nonlinear allometric modeling, common body size exponents for BM, FFM, and Vol were calculated. The point estimates for the size exponent (95% confidence interval) from the separate allometric models were: BM 0.79 (0.53-1.06), FFM 1.00 (0.78 -1.22), and Vol 0.64 (0.40-0.88). For the boys, substantial residual size correlations were observed for V̇O 2 max/BM 0.79 and V̇O 2 max/FFM 1.00, indicating that these variables did not correctly partition out the influence of body size. In contrast, scaling by Vol 0.64 led to no residual size correlation in boys or men. Scaling by BM is confounded by heterogeneity of body composition and potentially substantial differences in the mass exponent between boys and men. The FFM is precluded as an index of involved musculature because Vol did not represent a constant proportion of FFM [Vol∝FFM 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.77)] in the boys (unlike the men). We conclude that Vol, as an indicator of the involved muscle mass, is the most valid allometric denominator for the scaling of V̇O 2 max in a sample of boys and men heterogeneous for body size and composition. Copyright © 2006 the American Physiological Society.

Scaling of maximal oxygen uptake by lower leg muscle volume in boys and men

Narici, M.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2006

Abstract

The aim of this study was to critically examine the influence of body size on maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O 2 max) in boys and men using body mass (BM), estimated fat-free mass (FFM), and estimated lower leg muscle volume (Vol) as the separate scaling variables. V̇O 2 max and an in vivo measurement of Vol were assessed in 15 boys and 14 men. The FFM was estimated after percentage body fat had been predicted from population-specific skinfold measurements. By using nonlinear allometric modeling, common body size exponents for BM, FFM, and Vol were calculated. The point estimates for the size exponent (95% confidence interval) from the separate allometric models were: BM 0.79 (0.53-1.06), FFM 1.00 (0.78 -1.22), and Vol 0.64 (0.40-0.88). For the boys, substantial residual size correlations were observed for V̇O 2 max/BM 0.79 and V̇O 2 max/FFM 1.00, indicating that these variables did not correctly partition out the influence of body size. In contrast, scaling by Vol 0.64 led to no residual size correlation in boys or men. Scaling by BM is confounded by heterogeneity of body composition and potentially substantial differences in the mass exponent between boys and men. The FFM is precluded as an index of involved musculature because Vol did not represent a constant proportion of FFM [Vol∝FFM 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.77)] in the boys (unlike the men). We conclude that Vol, as an indicator of the involved muscle mass, is the most valid allometric denominator for the scaling of V̇O 2 max in a sample of boys and men heterogeneous for body size and composition. Copyright © 2006 the American Physiological Society.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3267077
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 56
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 54
social impact