Starting from Husserl’s idea of philosophy as a rigorous science, I intend here to investigate in what sense we should think of the way of being science that belongs to philosophy. In particular, argument is intended to oppose an idea of being science of philosophy that tends to conform philosophical work with those of specific scientific disciplines (and I refer here especially to Timothy Williamson and his thesis of the”unexceptional nature of philosophy”). The intention is therefore to show, through an analysis of the theories of Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kant, Hegel and Plato, the peculiarity of philosophical discourse as a discourse that claims to be scientific without having to adhere to the scientific model of particular knowledge. A model of being a science that must therefore also come to terms with the aporia it produces.
Sul concetto di filosofia. Le aporie della scientificità
Illetterati, L.
2018
Abstract
Starting from Husserl’s idea of philosophy as a rigorous science, I intend here to investigate in what sense we should think of the way of being science that belongs to philosophy. In particular, argument is intended to oppose an idea of being science of philosophy that tends to conform philosophical work with those of specific scientific disciplines (and I refer here especially to Timothy Williamson and his thesis of the”unexceptional nature of philosophy”). The intention is therefore to show, through an analysis of the theories of Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kant, Hegel and Plato, the peculiarity of philosophical discourse as a discourse that claims to be scientific without having to adhere to the scientific model of particular knowledge. A model of being a science that must therefore also come to terms with the aporia it produces.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




