Preeclampsia is a severe complication of human pregnancy as it leads to significant maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. A prompt recognition of women that develop this syndrome can improve clinical management, increase surveillance and, finally, improve outcomes. Different methods (based on history, ultrasound, serum and urinary biomarkers) were proposed a screening tests for this disease but their performance showed limited results. Urinary inositol phosphoglycans P-type (IPG-P) were shown to identify in advance most of the women who will develop preeclampsia in case-control and longitudinal studies, so we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. Seven studies met the entry criteria so were evaluated. All case-control studies showed excellent statistical performances in a quality statistical assessment. The meta-analysis considered three longitudinal, prospective studies that showed high sensitivity and specificity with ranges of 0.82- 0.99 and 0.90–1.00, respectively. Univariate measures of accuracy revealed a positive and negative likelihood ratio respectively of 3.61 (95% CI 1.56–5.67) and -2.35 (95% CI -3.79 to -0.91). By univariate approach, we found a pooled logarithm of diagnostic odds ratio of 6.15 (95% CI 2.64–9.67). A limitation of this analysis is that, although conducted in different settings (UK, Italy, France, South Africa, and Mauritius) and different clinical groups, they were based on a single academic group. According to our findings, IPG-P test showed very encouraging results as a rapid noninvasive screening test for preeclampsia. Further studies are needed to verify and to validate the reported findings.

Exploring strengths and limits of urinary D-chiro inositol phosphoglycans (IPG-P) as a screening test for preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Noventa M.;
2019

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a severe complication of human pregnancy as it leads to significant maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. A prompt recognition of women that develop this syndrome can improve clinical management, increase surveillance and, finally, improve outcomes. Different methods (based on history, ultrasound, serum and urinary biomarkers) were proposed a screening tests for this disease but their performance showed limited results. Urinary inositol phosphoglycans P-type (IPG-P) were shown to identify in advance most of the women who will develop preeclampsia in case-control and longitudinal studies, so we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. Seven studies met the entry criteria so were evaluated. All case-control studies showed excellent statistical performances in a quality statistical assessment. The meta-analysis considered three longitudinal, prospective studies that showed high sensitivity and specificity with ranges of 0.82- 0.99 and 0.90–1.00, respectively. Univariate measures of accuracy revealed a positive and negative likelihood ratio respectively of 3.61 (95% CI 1.56–5.67) and -2.35 (95% CI -3.79 to -0.91). By univariate approach, we found a pooled logarithm of diagnostic odds ratio of 6.15 (95% CI 2.64–9.67). A limitation of this analysis is that, although conducted in different settings (UK, Italy, France, South Africa, and Mauritius) and different clinical groups, they were based on a single academic group. According to our findings, IPG-P test showed very encouraging results as a rapid noninvasive screening test for preeclampsia. Further studies are needed to verify and to validate the reported findings.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3331462
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact