BACKGROUNDPulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) do not predict fluid responsiveness when using a protective ventilation strategy: the use of functional haemodynamic tests can be useful to overcome this limitation.OBJECTIVESWe tested the use of a tidal volume challenge (VTC), during 6 ml kg-1 [predicted body weight (PBW)] ventilation, and the end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) for prediction of fluid responsiveness.DESIGNAn interventional prospective study.SETTINGSupine elective neurosurgical patients.INTERVENTIONSThe study protocol was, first, the initial EEOT test was performed during baseline 6 ml kg-1 PBW ventilation; second, VTC was performed by increasing the VT up to 8 ml kg-1 PBW and PPV and SVV changes were recorded after 1 min; third, a second EEOT was performed during 8 ml kg-1 PBW ventilation; and VT was reduced back to 6 ml kg-1 PBW and a third EEOT was performed. Finally, a 250 ml fluid challenge was administered over 10 min to identify fluid responders (increase in stroke volume index ≥10%).RESULTSIn the 40 patients analysed, PPV and SVV values at baseline and EEOT performed at 6 ml kg-1 PBW did not predict fluid responsiveness. A 13.3% increase in PPV after VTC predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 76.1%, while a 12.1% increase in SVV after VTC predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 78.9% and a specificity of 95.2%. After EEOT performed at 8 ml kg-1 PBW, a 3.6% increase in cardiac index predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 89.4% and a specificity of 85.7%, while a 4.7% increase in stroke volume index (SVI) with a sensitivity of 89.4% and a specificity of 85.7%.CONCLUSIONThe changes in PPV and SVV obtained after VTC are reliable and comparable to the changes in CI and SVI obtained after EEOT performed at 8 ml kg-1 PBW in predicting fluid responsiveness in neurosurgical patients.TRIAL REGISTRATIONACTRN12618000351213.

Tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room: An observational study

Navalesi P.;
2019

Abstract

BACKGROUNDPulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) do not predict fluid responsiveness when using a protective ventilation strategy: the use of functional haemodynamic tests can be useful to overcome this limitation.OBJECTIVESWe tested the use of a tidal volume challenge (VTC), during 6 ml kg-1 [predicted body weight (PBW)] ventilation, and the end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) for prediction of fluid responsiveness.DESIGNAn interventional prospective study.SETTINGSupine elective neurosurgical patients.INTERVENTIONSThe study protocol was, first, the initial EEOT test was performed during baseline 6 ml kg-1 PBW ventilation; second, VTC was performed by increasing the VT up to 8 ml kg-1 PBW and PPV and SVV changes were recorded after 1 min; third, a second EEOT was performed during 8 ml kg-1 PBW ventilation; and VT was reduced back to 6 ml kg-1 PBW and a third EEOT was performed. Finally, a 250 ml fluid challenge was administered over 10 min to identify fluid responders (increase in stroke volume index ≥10%).RESULTSIn the 40 patients analysed, PPV and SVV values at baseline and EEOT performed at 6 ml kg-1 PBW did not predict fluid responsiveness. A 13.3% increase in PPV after VTC predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 76.1%, while a 12.1% increase in SVV after VTC predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 78.9% and a specificity of 95.2%. After EEOT performed at 8 ml kg-1 PBW, a 3.6% increase in cardiac index predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 89.4% and a specificity of 85.7%, while a 4.7% increase in stroke volume index (SVI) with a sensitivity of 89.4% and a specificity of 85.7%.CONCLUSIONThe changes in PPV and SVV obtained after VTC are reliable and comparable to the changes in CI and SVI obtained after EEOT performed at 8 ml kg-1 PBW in predicting fluid responsiveness in neurosurgical patients.TRIAL REGISTRATIONACTRN12618000351213.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Messina Tidal_volume_challenge_to_predict_fluid.6.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza: Accesso privato - non pubblico
Dimensione 390.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
390.44 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3338418
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 57
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 48
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact