This South African case is a landmark case concerning the right to freedom of peaceful assembly. A fundamental right, which is frequently ideally «merged» –or «confused into» –freedom of speech and association, though it represents a human right on its own. In Mlungwana, the ZACC has secured this fundamental freedom from possible abuses by State’s authorities. Indeed, as it will be discussed, this case follows a path that has been already drawn by the constitutional Court its previous case law. It represents a further development of the meaning of one of the most crucial constitutional guarantees in a constitutional democracy
Freedom of peaceful assembly and (un)constitutional limitations in South Africa
MICHELE DI BARI
2020
Abstract
This South African case is a landmark case concerning the right to freedom of peaceful assembly. A fundamental right, which is frequently ideally «merged» –or «confused into» –freedom of speech and association, though it represents a human right on its own. In Mlungwana, the ZACC has secured this fundamental freedom from possible abuses by State’s authorities. Indeed, as it will be discussed, this case follows a path that has been already drawn by the constitutional Court its previous case law. It represents a further development of the meaning of one of the most crucial constitutional guarantees in a constitutional democracyFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
28042020191044.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Freedom of peaceful assembly and (un)constitutional limitations in South Africa
Tipologia:
Published (publisher's version)
Licenza:
Accesso gratuito
Dimensione
470.78 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
470.78 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.