Background and aim of the work: hypermobility of the first ray (FRH) began to be considered as a pathological entity from Morton’s studies and was associated as a primary cause of hallux valgus (HV). Currently, this relationship is in discussion, and various authors consider FRH as a consequence of the deformity. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarise the most influential publications relating to FRM to increase knowledge and promote its conventional assessment during clinical practice. Methods: papers of the last century were selected to obtain a homogeneous and up-to-date overview of I-MTCJ mobility and HV, as well as their relation and management. Results: in recent years, FRH was studied from a biomechanical and pathophysiologic point of view. There is still not enough data regarding the aetiology of FRM. The higher rate of instability found in HV lacks an explanation of which is the cause and which is the effect. However, the Lapidus arthrodesis is still a valid method in cases of FRH and HV, even if is not rigorously indicated to treat both. When approaching FRH, radiographic or clinical findings are mandatory for the right diagnosis. Conclusions: FRM is an important factor that must be considered in routine clinical practice and prior and post HV surgery, as much as the conventional parameter assessed. Surgeons should consider performing I-MTCJ arthrodesis only if strictly necessary, also paying attention to soft tissue balancing. Improving the measurement of FRH could be useful to determine if it is a cause or effect of the HV deformity.

Hypermobility of the First Ray: the Cinderella of the measurements conventionally assessed for correction of Hallux Valgus

BIZ C.;MASO G.;MALGARINI E.;TAGLIAPIETRA J.;RUGGIERI P.
2020

Abstract

Background and aim of the work: hypermobility of the first ray (FRH) began to be considered as a pathological entity from Morton’s studies and was associated as a primary cause of hallux valgus (HV). Currently, this relationship is in discussion, and various authors consider FRH as a consequence of the deformity. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarise the most influential publications relating to FRM to increase knowledge and promote its conventional assessment during clinical practice. Methods: papers of the last century were selected to obtain a homogeneous and up-to-date overview of I-MTCJ mobility and HV, as well as their relation and management. Results: in recent years, FRH was studied from a biomechanical and pathophysiologic point of view. There is still not enough data regarding the aetiology of FRM. The higher rate of instability found in HV lacks an explanation of which is the cause and which is the effect. However, the Lapidus arthrodesis is still a valid method in cases of FRH and HV, even if is not rigorously indicated to treat both. When approaching FRH, radiographic or clinical findings are mandatory for the right diagnosis. Conclusions: FRM is an important factor that must be considered in routine clinical practice and prior and post HV surgery, as much as the conventional parameter assessed. Surgeons should consider performing I-MTCJ arthrodesis only if strictly necessary, also paying attention to soft tissue balancing. Improving the measurement of FRH could be useful to determine if it is a cause or effect of the HV deformity.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11577/3341720
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact