States are struggling to replace the anti-Covid-19 lockdowns that threaten the economy and freeze human mobility and interactions with softer, more digitalized forms of social distancing. The article analyzes to what extent fundamental rights’ issues revolving around tools such as smartphone apps that trace contacts are justiciable. The article focuses on the role of science, of amici curiae, and of proportionality scrutiny as three key elements that can play a role adjudicating cases of this kind.

Giudicare la pandemia con la proporzionalità. Le misure anti-covid-19, il vaglio giudiziario e il diritto comparato

Andrea Pin
2020

Abstract

States are struggling to replace the anti-Covid-19 lockdowns that threaten the economy and freeze human mobility and interactions with softer, more digitalized forms of social distancing. The article analyzes to what extent fundamental rights’ issues revolving around tools such as smartphone apps that trace contacts are justiciable. The article focuses on the role of science, of amici curiae, and of proportionality scrutiny as three key elements that can play a role adjudicating cases of this kind.
2020
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pin_Dpceonline_Covid.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (publisher's version)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 329.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
329.97 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3345147
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact