An original method for formulating surrogate fuels from actual syngas mixtures is presented and formalised. The method is the first example in the scientific literature of a rather complete tool for planning and setting up a laboratory syngas-fuelled engine test when some components of the syngas mixture are not available. Basically, the method allows a map to be built that provides the composition for a surrogate fuel once the composition of a syngas mixture is assigned, the components of a surrogate fuel are selected and the equivalence parameters are defined. The laminar flame speed, the energy density of the fuel–air mixture and the methane number are identified as equivalence parameters in the study. In particular, the proper laminar flame speed and energy density ensure that an engine fuelled by the surrogate mixture produces the same indicated power as it would when fuelled by the original syngas. Instead, the methane number allows for checking the fact that the tendency of the engine to knock is the same or greater than the knock tendency during syngas operation. In this article, the method is used to determine the hydrogen–methane–nitrogen mixtures corresponding to six five-component syngas mixtures, resulting from actual gasification processes. The laminar flame speed and methane number of each syngas mixture are estimated by means of simple original models aimed at either improving the predicting capabilities of existing models or allowing for a prompt application of the procedure. The results show that four of the six surrogate fuels are equally or more knock-prone than the original syngas mixtures, whereas only one of the two remaining surrogate fuels likely imposes a retardation of the spark advance in the final setup of the engine for actual syngas operation.

A method for determining hydrogen–methane–nitrogen mixtures for laboratory tests of syngas-fuelled internal combustion engines

Masi M.;
2020

Abstract

An original method for formulating surrogate fuels from actual syngas mixtures is presented and formalised. The method is the first example in the scientific literature of a rather complete tool for planning and setting up a laboratory syngas-fuelled engine test when some components of the syngas mixture are not available. Basically, the method allows a map to be built that provides the composition for a surrogate fuel once the composition of a syngas mixture is assigned, the components of a surrogate fuel are selected and the equivalence parameters are defined. The laminar flame speed, the energy density of the fuel–air mixture and the methane number are identified as equivalence parameters in the study. In particular, the proper laminar flame speed and energy density ensure that an engine fuelled by the surrogate mixture produces the same indicated power as it would when fuelled by the original syngas. Instead, the methane number allows for checking the fact that the tendency of the engine to knock is the same or greater than the knock tendency during syngas operation. In this article, the method is used to determine the hydrogen–methane–nitrogen mixtures corresponding to six five-component syngas mixtures, resulting from actual gasification processes. The laminar flame speed and methane number of each syngas mixture are estimated by means of simple original models aimed at either improving the predicting capabilities of existing models or allowing for a prompt application of the procedure. The results show that four of the six surrogate fuels are equally or more knock-prone than the original syngas mixtures, whereas only one of the two remaining surrogate fuels likely imposes a retardation of the spark advance in the final setup of the engine for actual syngas operation.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3350613
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact