Power consumption and task latency are two crucial issues in edge-cloud computing. This paper mainly aims to promote the use of clean power in geo-distributed data centers (DCs) in a deregulated electricity market where customers are allowed to buy power from multiple suppliers, combined with the guarantee of task latency. To alleviate the conflict between frequent switches of servers and the uncertainty of task arrivals in DCs, this paper proposes a two-timescale framework consisting of the long-term capacity planning of geo-distributed DCs and the real-time task dispatching from edge gateways (EGs) to DCs. First, DCs make long-term plans on the number of active servers aiming at the eco-friendly and delay-aware power cost minimization, which is formulated as problem P. Specifically, we introduce a convex pollution indicator function (PIF) to measure the pollution cost of the various types of powers sold by different suppliers, which can encourage the use of cleaner power and improve power savings. Second, in each sub-slot, each EG separately optimizes its individual mixed strategies of task dispatching to DCs with the knowledge of the planned capacities and the real-time queue backlogs of DCs, where a Lyapunov optimization framework is applied. Finally, we give the corresponding distributed algorithm design. Simulation results reveal that our method can realize the trade-off between the power cost and the delay cost of requests, and improve the clean power usage by up to 50%-60% of the total power usage in DCs. Additionally, comparisons with other schemes show that our approach can provide more stable guarantees of task latency in different situations of workload density, which benefits from the diverse-timescale optimizations of capacities of DCs and task routing from EGs to DCs.

Eco-friendly powering and delay-aware task scheduling in geo-distributed edge-cloud system: A two-timescale framework

Zorzi M.
2020

Abstract

Power consumption and task latency are two crucial issues in edge-cloud computing. This paper mainly aims to promote the use of clean power in geo-distributed data centers (DCs) in a deregulated electricity market where customers are allowed to buy power from multiple suppliers, combined with the guarantee of task latency. To alleviate the conflict between frequent switches of servers and the uncertainty of task arrivals in DCs, this paper proposes a two-timescale framework consisting of the long-term capacity planning of geo-distributed DCs and the real-time task dispatching from edge gateways (EGs) to DCs. First, DCs make long-term plans on the number of active servers aiming at the eco-friendly and delay-aware power cost minimization, which is formulated as problem P. Specifically, we introduce a convex pollution indicator function (PIF) to measure the pollution cost of the various types of powers sold by different suppliers, which can encourage the use of cleaner power and improve power savings. Second, in each sub-slot, each EG separately optimizes its individual mixed strategies of task dispatching to DCs with the knowledge of the planned capacities and the real-time queue backlogs of DCs, where a Lyapunov optimization framework is applied. Finally, we give the corresponding distributed algorithm design. Simulation results reveal that our method can realize the trade-off between the power cost and the delay cost of requests, and improve the clean power usage by up to 50%-60% of the total power usage in DCs. Additionally, comparisons with other schemes show that our approach can provide more stable guarantees of task latency in different situations of workload density, which benefits from the diverse-timescale optimizations of capacities of DCs and task routing from EGs to DCs.
2020
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3352073
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact