Delayed xenograft rejection (DXR) of pig organs by baboons currently represents the major obstacle to successful xenotransplantation. Although antibodies (Abs) are believed to play a fundamental role in this form of rejection, so far little is known concerning the potential cellular component. Biopsies taken during DXR of human CD55 transgenic pig hearts by non-treated (n = 2), α-Gal immunoadsorbed (n = 2), or immunosuppressed (n = 9) baboons were studied. The cellular element was explored by determining not only its phenotype by classical immunohistochemical techniques but also its activity in terms of cytokines, cytolytic enzymes and other mediators using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. All porcine xenografts underwent DXR; within 5 days in non-treated and immunoadsorbed animals but significantly delayed (6 to 29 days) in immunosuppressed animals. Cellular infiltration in non-immunosuppressed grafts consisted predominantly of monocytes/macrophages, CD8 cells and a few CD4 T-cells. The predominant baboon transcripts detectable were the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin1-α and tumor necrosis factor-α, the lymphokine interferon-γ and the cytotoxic enzyme granzyme B. However, these cellular components were lacking in the immunosuppressed animals. Despite these differences, strong immunoglobulin M (IgM) and C5b-9 complement deposition was observed in all animals at rejection. Together our findings suggest that although the humoral response plays a predominant role in DXR through IgM Abs and complement activation, there is a clear cellular infiltrate in DXR in this model that is likely to contribute to rejection through a strong pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic environment, necessitating substantial immunosuppression for a prolonged graft survival.

Cellular participation in delayed xenograft rejection of hCD55 transgenic pig hearts by baboons

Cozzi E.;
2003

Abstract

Delayed xenograft rejection (DXR) of pig organs by baboons currently represents the major obstacle to successful xenotransplantation. Although antibodies (Abs) are believed to play a fundamental role in this form of rejection, so far little is known concerning the potential cellular component. Biopsies taken during DXR of human CD55 transgenic pig hearts by non-treated (n = 2), α-Gal immunoadsorbed (n = 2), or immunosuppressed (n = 9) baboons were studied. The cellular element was explored by determining not only its phenotype by classical immunohistochemical techniques but also its activity in terms of cytokines, cytolytic enzymes and other mediators using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. All porcine xenografts underwent DXR; within 5 days in non-treated and immunoadsorbed animals but significantly delayed (6 to 29 days) in immunosuppressed animals. Cellular infiltration in non-immunosuppressed grafts consisted predominantly of monocytes/macrophages, CD8 cells and a few CD4 T-cells. The predominant baboon transcripts detectable were the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin1-α and tumor necrosis factor-α, the lymphokine interferon-γ and the cytotoxic enzyme granzyme B. However, these cellular components were lacking in the immunosuppressed animals. Despite these differences, strong immunoglobulin M (IgM) and C5b-9 complement deposition was observed in all animals at rejection. Together our findings suggest that although the humoral response plays a predominant role in DXR through IgM Abs and complement activation, there is a clear cellular infiltrate in DXR in this model that is likely to contribute to rejection through a strong pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic environment, necessitating substantial immunosuppression for a prolonged graft survival.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3357502
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact