Background: The parapharyngeal space (PPS) can harbor a variety of tumors that can be approached through a wide spectrum of surgical routes. A decisional algorithm on the surgical approach to resect PPS lesions was tested in terms of reliability by retrospectively applying it to a large series of patients. Methods: Patients treated at the Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery of the University of Brescia, Italy, for tumor or tumor-like lesions involving the PPS between October 1986 and July 2019 were included in the retrospective analysis. Tumor characteristics, clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, type of resection, surgical approach, and oncologic and morbidity outcomes were reviewed. Reliability of the algorithm was calculated as the number of cases in which the expected approach was confirmed/total number of cases × 100. Results: The analysis included 153 patients. Most lesions (64.1%) were benign. The most frequent complaint at presentation was unilateral oropharyngeal medialization (47.1%), followed by neck/parotid swelling (41.2%). Ninety-two (61.3%) lesions were excised through an enucleation/extracapsular dissection. Wide-margin resection and compartmental resection were performed in 17 (11.3%) and 41 (27.3%) patients, respectively. A single-corridor approach was employed in 132 (87.4%) cases. Combinations of multiple corridors were adopted in 19 (12.6%) patients. Reliability of the decision-making algorithm was 91.2%. Capsular integrity and margin status affected prognosis of pleomorphic adenomas and PPS malignancies, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed decision-making algorithm can reliably guide approach selection, which should primarily aim at ensuring intact-capsule excision of benign lesions suspicious for pleomorphic adenomas and clear-margins resection of PPS malignancies.
Selection of the surgical approach for lesions with parapharyngeal space involvement: A single-center experience on 153 cases
Ferrari M.;Nicolai P.
2020
Abstract
Background: The parapharyngeal space (PPS) can harbor a variety of tumors that can be approached through a wide spectrum of surgical routes. A decisional algorithm on the surgical approach to resect PPS lesions was tested in terms of reliability by retrospectively applying it to a large series of patients. Methods: Patients treated at the Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery of the University of Brescia, Italy, for tumor or tumor-like lesions involving the PPS between October 1986 and July 2019 were included in the retrospective analysis. Tumor characteristics, clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, type of resection, surgical approach, and oncologic and morbidity outcomes were reviewed. Reliability of the algorithm was calculated as the number of cases in which the expected approach was confirmed/total number of cases × 100. Results: The analysis included 153 patients. Most lesions (64.1%) were benign. The most frequent complaint at presentation was unilateral oropharyngeal medialization (47.1%), followed by neck/parotid swelling (41.2%). Ninety-two (61.3%) lesions were excised through an enucleation/extracapsular dissection. Wide-margin resection and compartmental resection were performed in 17 (11.3%) and 41 (27.3%) patients, respectively. A single-corridor approach was employed in 132 (87.4%) cases. Combinations of multiple corridors were adopted in 19 (12.6%) patients. Reliability of the decision-making algorithm was 91.2%. Capsular integrity and margin status affected prognosis of pleomorphic adenomas and PPS malignancies, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed decision-making algorithm can reliably guide approach selection, which should primarily aim at ensuring intact-capsule excision of benign lesions suspicious for pleomorphic adenomas and clear-margins resection of PPS malignancies.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S1368837520303080-main.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza:
Accesso privato - non pubblico
Dimensione
7.42 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
7.42 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




