Purpose: Liver iron quantification by MRI has become routine. Pixelwise (PW) fitting to the iron-mediated signal decay has some advantages but is slower and more vulnerable to noise than region-based techniques. We present a fast, pseudo-pixelwise mapping (PPWM) algorithm. Materials and Methods: The PPWM algorithm divides the entire liver into non-contiguous groups of pixels sorted by rapid relative relaxivity estimates. Pixels within each group of like-relaxivity were binned and fit using a Levenberg–Marquadt algorithm. Results: The developed algorithm worked about 30 times faster than the traditional PW approach and generated R2* maps qualitatively and quantitatively similar. No systematic difference was observed in median R2* values with a coefficient of variability (CoV) of 2.4%. Intra-observer and inter-observer errors were also under 2.5%. Small systematic differences were observed in the right tail of the R2* distribution resulting in slightly lower mean R2* values (CoV of 4.2%) and moderately lower SD of R2* values for the PPWM algorithm. Moreover, the PPWM provided the best accuracy, giving a lower error of R2* estimates. Conclusion: The PPWM yielded comparable reproducibility and higher accuracy than the TPWM. The method is suitable for relaxivity maps in other organs and applications.

Fast approximation to pixelwise relaxivity maps: Validation in iron overloaded subjects

Pepe A;
2013

Abstract

Purpose: Liver iron quantification by MRI has become routine. Pixelwise (PW) fitting to the iron-mediated signal decay has some advantages but is slower and more vulnerable to noise than region-based techniques. We present a fast, pseudo-pixelwise mapping (PPWM) algorithm. Materials and Methods: The PPWM algorithm divides the entire liver into non-contiguous groups of pixels sorted by rapid relative relaxivity estimates. Pixels within each group of like-relaxivity were binned and fit using a Levenberg–Marquadt algorithm. Results: The developed algorithm worked about 30 times faster than the traditional PW approach and generated R2* maps qualitatively and quantitatively similar. No systematic difference was observed in median R2* values with a coefficient of variability (CoV) of 2.4%. Intra-observer and inter-observer errors were also under 2.5%. Small systematic differences were observed in the right tail of the R2* distribution resulting in slightly lower mean R2* values (CoV of 4.2%) and moderately lower SD of R2* values for the PPWM algorithm. Moreover, the PPWM provided the best accuracy, giving a lower error of R2* estimates. Conclusion: The PPWM yielded comparable reproducibility and higher accuracy than the TPWM. The method is suitable for relaxivity maps in other organs and applications.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3407400
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact