Shall Article 1(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 258/97 be interpreted as meaning that the expression ‘new primary molecular structure’ relates to foods or food ingredients which were not used for human consumption in the territory of the EU before 15 May 1997, or to those whose molecular structure did not exist as such in nature before that date? In case C-448/14, the EU Court opts for the first solution, thus including in the scope of the Novel Food Regulation also substances of mineral origin. This short note comments on the judgment, with an approach that, though critical, ends up in sharing the Court’s findings.

"New primary molecular structure” and novel foods according to the Court: constructive or demolishing interpretation? The EU Court Judgment in case C-448/14

Paganizza V
2017

Abstract

Shall Article 1(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 258/97 be interpreted as meaning that the expression ‘new primary molecular structure’ relates to foods or food ingredients which were not used for human consumption in the territory of the EU before 15 May 1997, or to those whose molecular structure did not exist as such in nature before that date? In case C-448/14, the EU Court opts for the first solution, thus including in the scope of the Novel Food Regulation also substances of mineral origin. This short note comments on the judgment, with an approach that, though critical, ends up in sharing the Court’s findings.
2017
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3415707
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact