Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in endometrial cancer: First analysis of survival of a randomized prospective study

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopy has been proved to be safe and reliable in staging of patients with endometrial cancer. It has definite advantages over laparotomy, but a comparable survival outcome is still to be verified in prospective randomized trials. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Department of Gynecology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-two women with uterine cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Laparotomy and laparoscopy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were allocated to the laparoscopy arm, and 59 were allocated to the laparotomy arm. Median follow-up for all patients was 44 months (range 5-96 months). Eight patients (12.6%) in the laparoscopy group had a recurrence versus five patients (8.5%) in the laparotomy group (p = .65). At median follow-up, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the laparoscopy group and laparotomy group were 87.4% versus 91.6% and 82.7% versus 86.5%, respectively. Cause-specific survival (CSS) was 90.5% in the laparoscopy group versus 94.9% in the laparotomy group. In patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I, DFS was 91.2% in the laparoscopy group versus 93.8% in the laparotomy group, OS was 86.5% versus 89.7%, and CSS was 93.4% versus 95.9%. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic vaginal treatment of patients with endometrial cancer provides a survival outcome comparable with laparotomy. If these data are confirmed, laparoscopic procedures should be included in routine therapy for patients with endometrial cancer. © 2005 AAGL. All rights reserved.