BACKGROUND: Only preclinical studies and case reports have described robotic surgery for endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of a novel robotic endoscope holder, developed for transsphenoidal surgery. METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled for 3 mo at the Neurosurgery Unit of Brescia. Endoscope Robot® was used to assist during the sphenoidal phase of the approach, tumor removal, and skull base reconstruction. A Likert scale questionnaire was given to all surgeons after each procedure. Patients who underwent robotic-assisted surgery were matched with nonrobotic ones for pathology and type of procedure. All surgical videos were evaluated during bimanual phases. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent robot-assisted, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for different pathologies (16 pituitary adenomas, 3 chordomas, 1 craniopharyngioma, 1 pituitary exploration for Cushing disease) for a total of 23 procedures (1 patient underwent 2 endoscopic revisions of a skull base reconstruction). Subjective advantages reported by surgeons included smoothness of movement, image steadiness, and improvement of maneuvers in narrow spaces and with angled endoscopes; as the main limitation, Endoscope Robot® appeared to be relatively heavy during the initial endoscope positioning. A comparative analysis with a historical matched cohort documented similar clinical outcomes, while endoscope lens cleaning and position readjustments were significantly less frequent in robotic procedures. CONCLUSION: Although confirmation in larger studies is needed, Endoscope Robot® was a safe and effective tool, especially advantageous in lengthy interventions through deep and narrow corridors.

Hybrid Robotics for Endoscopic Transnasal Skull Base Surgery: Single-Centre Case Series

Ferrari M.;Taboni S.;Nicolai P.;
2021

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Only preclinical studies and case reports have described robotic surgery for endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of a novel robotic endoscope holder, developed for transsphenoidal surgery. METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled for 3 mo at the Neurosurgery Unit of Brescia. Endoscope Robot® was used to assist during the sphenoidal phase of the approach, tumor removal, and skull base reconstruction. A Likert scale questionnaire was given to all surgeons after each procedure. Patients who underwent robotic-assisted surgery were matched with nonrobotic ones for pathology and type of procedure. All surgical videos were evaluated during bimanual phases. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent robot-assisted, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for different pathologies (16 pituitary adenomas, 3 chordomas, 1 craniopharyngioma, 1 pituitary exploration for Cushing disease) for a total of 23 procedures (1 patient underwent 2 endoscopic revisions of a skull base reconstruction). Subjective advantages reported by surgeons included smoothness of movement, image steadiness, and improvement of maneuvers in narrow spaces and with angled endoscopes; as the main limitation, Endoscope Robot® appeared to be relatively heavy during the initial endoscope positioning. A comparative analysis with a historical matched cohort documented similar clinical outcomes, while endoscope lens cleaning and position readjustments were significantly less frequent in robotic procedures. CONCLUSION: Although confirmation in larger studies is needed, Endoscope Robot® was a safe and effective tool, especially advantageous in lengthy interventions through deep and narrow corridors.
2021
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
opab327.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Published (publisher's version)
Licenza: Accesso privato - non pubblico
Dimensione 2.27 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.27 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3439582
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact